evidoria

What works in Greenland

All catalogues

4
evaluated practices
75/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Greenland

Drawn from: Greenland Connect — Submarine Fibre Bringing Broadband to the Arctic · DMI's ASIP — AI-Generated Sea-Ice Charts Quadruple Coverage of Greenland's Coastal Waters · Greenland's Act on Gender Equality and Council of Gender Equality · Greenland Venture–Vækstfonden Growth Capital Partnership

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Transferability / demonstrated replication +18 pts 78 here · 60 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Innovation level +12 pts 73 here · 62 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +11 pts 89 here · 78 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +10 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Scalability beyond pilot -12 pts 50 here · 62 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Inclusiveness / equity -43 pts 0 here · 43 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Transparency, fairness & accountability
100 · 54
Governance, capability & sustainability
100 · 64
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Transferability / demonstrated replication
78 · 60
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Innovation level
73 · 62
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Sustainability (ongoing)
89 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 57
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Scalability beyond pilot
50 · 62
Efficiency
0 · 32
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 43
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70

Coloured bar: Greenland. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Greenland Connect — Submarine Fibre Bringing Broadband to the Arctic · 96

DMI's ASIP — AI-Generated Sea-Ice Charts Quadruple Coverage of Greenland's Coastal Waters · 93

Greenland's Act on Gender Equality and Council of Gender Equality · 67

Greenland Venture–Vækstfonden Growth Capital Partnership · 43

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Greenland concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more