What works in Hong Kong
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Hong Kong
Hong Kong has implemented several large-scale digital inclusion and accessibility initiatives. The 'Smart Silver' Digital Inclusion Programme has reached 150,000+ elderly residents since 2014 and targets 45,000+ more in 2025–26, while the Innovation and Technology Fund for Elderly and Rehabilitation Care has disbursed HK$910 million to roughly 2,100 service units for over 27,000 assistive and monitoring technology products by December 2025. On digital accessibility, 439 websites and 102 mobile apps received recognition in the 2024–25 round, including 119 new 'elderly-friendly' badges. Additionally, Hong Kong's mandatory board diversity rule reduced single-gender boards from 32.9% of issuers in 2021 to roughly 3% by 2025, raising women's board representation from ~15% to 21.5%.
Drawn from: "Smart Silver" Digital Inclusion Programme for Elders · Hong Kong's Innovation and Technology Fund for Elderly and Rehabilitation Care (Gerontechnology) · Digital Accessibility Recognition Scheme — Hong Kong's Certification Model for Accessible Websites and Apps · Hong Kong Stock Exchange's Single-Gender Board Ban (2022–2024) · GenA.I. Sandbox++ — Hong Kong's Four-Regulator Agentic-AI Testing Programme for Banks, Insurers and Asset Managers · 1823 — Hong Kong's AI-Assisted Citizen Contact Centre Now Resolving 90%+ of Chatbot Enquiries · Cyberport — Hong Kong's Government-Backed Digital Technology Flagship · University of Hong Kong — Redesigning Assessment Instead of Policing It in the GenAI Era
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Effectiveness +34 pts 100 here · 66 average
Evaluation evidence +31 pts 80 here · 49 average
Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average
Governance, certification & transferability +14 pts 78 here · 64 average
Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value +10 pts 67 here · 57 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +9 pts 56 here · 47 average
Weaknesses
Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -10 pts 17 here · 27 average
Innovation level -13 pts 49 here · 62 average
Impact on gender equality -20 pts 50 here · 70 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -24 pts 50 here · 74 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -31 pts 17 here · 48 average
Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding -39 pts 50 here · 89 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Hong Kong. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
"Smart Silver" Digital Inclusion Programme for Elders · 92
Hong Kong's Innovation and Technology Fund for Elderly and Rehabilitation Care (Gerontechnology) · 88
Hong Kong Stock Exchange's Single-Gender Board Ban (2022–2024) · 85
1823 — Hong Kong's AI-Assisted Citizen Contact Centre Now Resolving 90%+ of Chatbot Enquiries · 80
Cyberport — Hong Kong's Government-Backed Digital Technology Flagship · 76
University of Hong Kong — Redesigning Assessment Instead of Policing It in the GenAI Era · 73
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Cities with evaluated practice
Where the documented practice in Hong Kong concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more