evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

"Smart Silver" Digital Inclusion Programme for Elders

Hong Kong · Hong Kong · See the Hong Kong profile · See the Hong Kong profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 23% 92/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Hong Kong's 'Smart Silver' programme has reached 150,000+ elderly residents since 2014 via outreach visits, mobile stations and ICT training; the 2025-26 round targets 45,000+ more seniors, backed by HK$100m for new community digital support stations.

150,000+
Cumulative elderly participants (2014-2025)
100 million HKD
Community support-station funding (from Dec 2024)
45,000+
Seniors targeted in 2025 round
"Smart Silver" Digital Inclusion Programme for Elders

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Digital Policy Office & Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Fund (SIE Fund), Government of the Hong Kong SAR
Period
2014–present
Keywords
elderly digital literacy, ICT training, ageing, community outreach

Context

Since 2014 Hong Kong's government has run the 'Smart Silver' ICT Outreach Programme for Elders, in which non-profit partner organisations visit elderly residents to introduce everyday digital tools; an Enriched ICT Training Programme (2019) and a dedicated Elderly IT Learning Portal extend the offer to the iAM Smart digital identity, e-payments and cyber security.

Results

Cumulative participation exceeds 150,000 elderly people; the round announced in June 2025 alone is expected to reach at least 45,000 more seniors through 400+ mobile digital service-station activities, and since December 2024 the SIE Fund has allocated HK$100 million to 12 district organisations running walk-in community digital support stations across all 18 districts.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful