evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Hong Kong Stock Exchange's Single-Gender Board Ban (2022–2024)

Hong Kong · Hong Kong · See the Hong Kong profile · See the Hong Kong profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 26% 85/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

HKEX banned single-gender boards for 2,700+ issuers in 2022, with a Dec 2024 deadline. Single-gender boards fell from 32.9% (2021) to ~3% (2025); women's board seats rose from ~15% to 21.5%.

32.9 %
Issuers with all-male boards (2021)
3 %
Issuers with all-male boards (early 2025)
21.5 %
Women's share of board seats (2026)
Hong Kong Stock Exchange's Single-Gender Board Ban (2022–2024)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX)
Period
2022–2025
Keywords
corporate governance, capital markets, financial regulation, listing rules

Context

Effective 1 January 2022, HKEX amended its Listing Rules to require every issuer's board to include at least one director of a different gender, giving existing single-gender boards a three-year transition to 31 December 2024.

Results

At the time of the rule change, 850 of roughly 2,650 listed issuers (32.9%) had all-male boards; this fell to 21% by HKEX's November 2023 review and to roughly 3% by early 2025. Women's overall share of board seats rose from about 15% in 2021 to 21.5% by 2026, with roughly 23% of issuers already at 30%+ female representation.

Conclusions

The mandate sets only a one-director floor rather than a proportional target, so quantitative gains have outpaced qualitative change; critics note a risk of token appointments, and the rule does not extend to executive management or gender pay data.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful