evidoria

What works in Haiti

All catalogues

5
evaluated practices
50/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Haiti

The evidence shows Haiti recovering from the 2010 earthquake through multiple large-scale interventions. Mobile money infrastructure grew rapidly, with MonCash reaching 805,000 active users within two years and delivering 57% of social-protection cash transfers by 2023, demonstrating prize-based market development. Post-earthquake housing reconstruction repaired over 1,200 homes and closed six displacement camps while generating 15,000+ paid workdays for local residents, though long-term impacts were not evaluated. A $22.4 million Green Climate Fund programme is targeting agroforestry across 25,440 hectares to reduce flood risk for 54,252 farmers, though these are approved targets rather than verified results since implementation only began in 2021.

Drawn from: Haiti Mobile Money Initiative — Building a National Mobile Money Market (MonCash & T-Cash) · The 16/6 Project — Port-au-Prince's Post-Earthquake Neighbourhood Return Programme · Trois-Rivières Watershed Agroforestry & Flood-Risk Reduction Programme (Haiti) — GCF-Financed Integrated Flood Management · Haiti's Constitutional 30% Gender Quota — A Cautionary Case · Akademi x Universite Quisqueya — Six-Month Data Science & AI Bootcamp (Port-au-Prince)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +36 pts 67 here · 31 average

Governance, certification & transferability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +25 pts 67 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / replicability -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Scalability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average

Sustainability -34 pts 44 here · 78 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 31
Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 64
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 76
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 59
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Innovation level
63 · 63
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Transferability / replicability
50 · 59
Scalability & sustainability
50 · 64
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 51
Sustainability
44 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37
Efficiency
0 · 44
Transparency, ethics & data protection
0 · 48
Equity & inclusion
0 · 52
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Achievement / evidence
0 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 91

Coloured bar: Haiti. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Haiti Mobile Money Initiative — Building a National Mobile Money Market (MonCash & T-Cash) · 92

The 16/6 Project — Port-au-Prince's Post-Earthquake Neighbourhood Return Programme · 67

Trois-Rivières Watershed Agroforestry & Flood-Risk Reduction Programme (Haiti) — GCF-Financed Integrated Flood Management · 53

Haiti's Constitutional 30% Gender Quota — A Cautionary Case · 26

Akademi x Universite Quisqueya — Six-Month Data Science & AI Bootcamp (Port-au-Prince) · 13

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Haiti concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more