evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

The 16/6 Project — Port-au-Prince's Post-Earthquake Neighbourhood Return Programme

Haiti · Port-au-Prince · See the Haiti profile · See the Port-au-Prince profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 54% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A joint UN–World Bank programme rebuilt housing across 16 Port-au-Prince neighbourhoods and closed 6 displacement camps after the 2010 earthquake, repairing 1,200+ homes and generating 15,000+ local working days, with 95% of jobs filled by residents.

1,200+
Homes repaired (UNOPS component) (2011-2019)
750
New houses targeted (2011-2019)
15,000+
Days of paid local work generated (2011-2019)
95%
Workforce hired from affected neighbourhoods (2011-2019)
150+
Construction workers trained (2011-2019)
5,239
Households targeted for return from camps (2011-2019)
33,000+
Families benefiting (wider joint programme, UNOPS figure) (2011-2019)
The 16/6 Project — Port-au-Prince's Post-Earthquake Neighbourhood Return Programme

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Government of Haiti with UNDP, ILO, IOM, UNOPS and the World Bank-administered Haiti Reconstruction Fund
Period
2011–2019
Keywords
housing, urban regeneration, disaster recovery, community development

Context

The January 2010 earthquake displaced roughly 1.5 million people into camps across Port-au-Prince, leaving the Government of Haiti and international partners to plan a return of displaced households to their home neighbourhoods.

Objectives

The 16 Neighbourhoods / 6 Camps (16/6) project, launched in August 2011 by the Government of Haiti, four UN agencies (UNDP, ILO, IOM, UNOPS) and the World Bank-administered Haiti Reconstruction Fund, targeted the voluntary, safe return of displaced households from six IDP camps to sixteen structurally-assessed home neighbourhoods in Port-au-Prince, Delmas and Pétion-Ville.

Activities

The UNOPS-implemented component repaired homes to risk-mitigation standards, built new housing, generated paid local work reserved largely for residents of the affected neighbourhoods, and trained construction workers jointly with the ILO, while the World Bank-administered fund financed the wider camp-closure and return effort.

Results

The UNOPS component alone repaired more than 1,200 homes against a target of 750 new houses, generated over 15,000 days of paid local work with 95% of the workforce hired locally, and trained more than 150 construction workers; the World Bank's design targeted the return of 5,239 households, about 30,000 people, from the six camps, which were subsequently closed.

Conclusions

The project required repeated restructuring past its original 2013 completion target, reflecting the delays typical of complex multi-agency post-disaster reconstruction, and no long-term evaluation of housing durability or resident income effects was located, leaving the programme's lasting impact only partially documented.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Multi-donor financing of roughly US$78m across the joint programme.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — 2011-2019, restructured several times past the original 2013 completion target.
Staffing & skills
Government of Haiti coordination, UNDP, ILO, IOM and UNOPS implementing teams, World Bank-administered Haiti Reconstruction Fund management, locally-hired construction workers, 95% from affected neighbourhoods, trained jointly with the ILO

Conditions for success

  • Coordinated multi-agency delivery (four UN agencies plus national government) around simultaneous housing repair, camp closure and local job creation
  • Structural assessment of home neighbourhoods before enabling household return
  • Reserving the large majority of paid construction labour for residents of the affected neighbourhoods

Common failure modes

  • Multiple restructurings were required past the original 2013 completion date
  • Reported beneficiary totals differ materially between UNOPS and World Bank reporting, complicating any single audited count
  • No long-term outcome evaluation of housing durability or resident income effects was found after project closure

Where it fits

Governance type
national government plus multi-agency UN/World Bank coordination
Scale
16 neighbourhoods and 6 camps within metropolitan Port-au-Prince
Income level
low-income, post-disaster context

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 95

Smart Open Lisboa

Portugal

Smart Open Lisboa (SOL) is a startup program focused on the validation and integration of innovative solutions meant to upgrade …