evidoria

What works in Saint Kitts and Nevis

All catalogues

6
evaluated practices
49/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Kitts and Nevis has undertaken several institutional and workforce-development initiatives. The National Gender Equality Policy and Action Plan 2022–2027 established ten priority areas across governance, economic empowerment, education, health and gender-based violence, with domestic-violence reports rising from 87 cases (2019) to 359 cases (2020)—though this 400% increase plausibly reflects improved reporting awareness rather than a demonstrated change in prevalence. The Cyber Nations Program completed its first cohort of 21 cybersecurity graduates in November 2025, well below its 100-national certification target. The St Kitts and Nevis Citizenship by Investment Programme has shifted from generating roughly 50% of GDP in 2021 to an estimated 5% in 2025, reflecting international scrutiny but greater sustainability according to IMF assessment.

Drawn from: National Gender Equality Policy and Action Plan 2022–2027 · Cyber Nations Program — Cybersecurity Workforce Training, St Kitts and Nevis · St Kitts and Nevis Citizenship by Investment Programme — From Half of GDP to a 'More Sustainable' Model · ECCU Generative AI & Python Summer Camp — Eastern Caribbean Youth Build Chatbots Across Seven Islands · VoiceIt — Saint Kitts and Nevis' AI Legal Assistant for Citizens · Pest Control Initiative for Invasive Vervet Monkeys — St. Kitts and Nevis

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +11 pts 89 here · 78 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Scalability beyond pilot -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Innovation level -16 pts 47 here · 63 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Inclusiveness / equity -42 pts 0 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -42 pts 33 here · 76 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Sustainability (ongoing)
89 · 78
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Scalability beyond pilot
56 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 59
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Governance, capability & sustainability
50 · 64
Innovation level
47 · 63
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
33 · 76
Efficiency
0 · 44
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 50
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80

Coloured bar: Saint Kitts and Nevis. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

National Gender Equality Policy and Action Plan 2022–2027 · 74

Cyber Nations Program — Cybersecurity Workforce Training, St Kitts and Nevis · 72

St Kitts and Nevis Citizenship by Investment Programme — From Half of GDP to a 'More Sustainable' Model · 48

ECCU Generative AI & Python Summer Camp — Eastern Caribbean Youth Build Chatbots Across Seven Islands · 47

VoiceIt — Saint Kitts and Nevis' AI Legal Assistant for Citizens · 33

Pest Control Initiative for Invasive Vervet Monkeys — St. Kitts and Nevis · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Saint Kitts and Nevis concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more