evidoria

What works in Laos

All catalogues

12
evaluated practices
44/100
average quality score
9%
strong evidence, of 11 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Laos

Drawn from: Digital CBID Case Management Tool — USAID Okard's KoBoCollect System for Disability Case Management in Laos · Lao PDR's Ethics-Guided National AI Literacy & TVET Instructor Programme · Project Sinxay — UNICEF-Arm AI Literacy Bootcamps for Lao Youth with a 50% Girls Quota · Nam Theun 2 Watershed Management and Protection Authority PES (Lao PDR) · Lao PDR SME Access to Finance Project — World Bank Credit Line and Risk-Sharing Facility for Bank SME Lending · Eduten Adaptive Maths Platform — 12-Week AI Numeracy Pilot for Grade 3 Students in Lao PDR · Luang Prabang–Sejong City Startup Ecosystem Partnership · Laos's 30% Women's Assembly Target — Declining Despite a Decade of Policy

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evidence of learning impact +29 pts 56 here · 26 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +10 pts 83 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Transferability / replicability -18 pts 42 here · 60 average

Innovation level -20 pts 42 here · 62 average

Scalability & sustainability -23 pts 39 here · 62 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -35 pts 22 here · 57 average

Sustainability -45 pts 33 here · 78 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Achievement / evidence -87 pts 0 here · 87 average

Score profile vs peers

Evidence of learning impact
56 · 26
Curator validation
100 · 73
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 74
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 38
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 27
Evaluation evidence
50 · 49
Governance, certification & transferability
58 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Transferability / replicability
42 · 60
Innovation level
42 · 62
Scalability & sustainability
39 · 62
Documented learning
50 · 74
Demonstrated reach
50 · 76
Efficiency
0 · 32
Evidence of impact / measured public value
22 · 57
Sustainability
33 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
0 · 54
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70
Achievement / evidence
0 · 87

Coloured bar: Laos. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Digital CBID Case Management Tool — USAID Okard's KoBoCollect System for Disability Case Management in Laos · 92

Lao PDR's Ethics-Guided National AI Literacy & TVET Instructor Programme · 60

Project Sinxay — UNICEF-Arm AI Literacy Bootcamps for Lao Youth with a 50% Girls Quota · 60

Nam Theun 2 Watershed Management and Protection Authority PES (Lao PDR) · 53

Lao PDR SME Access to Finance Project — World Bank Credit Line and Risk-Sharing Facility for Bank SME Lending · 48

Eduten Adaptive Maths Platform — 12-Week AI Numeracy Pilot for Grade 3 Students in Lao PDR · 47

Luang Prabang–Sejong City Startup Ecosystem Partnership · 38

Laos's 30% Women's Assembly Target — Declining Despite a Decade of Policy · 37

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Laos concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more