evidoria

What works in Luxembourg

All catalogues

31
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 29 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Luxembourg

Drawn from: Luxembourg's Open-Data Accessibility Monitoring — Six Years of Published Audits, and Only 2 of ~900 Services Compliant · data.europa.eu's eTranslation — Automated Neural Machine Translation of Open-Data Metadata Across 24 EU Languages · Free Public Transport — Luxembourg's Nationwide Fare-Abolition Experiment · Vote Parity · University of Luxembourg - Gender Equality · Actions Positives · Equality in Municipalities · Luxembourg National Talent Strategy — Luxinnovation & ADEM Partnership

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Governance, certification & transferability +24 pts 89 here · 64 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Curator validation +12 pts 86 here · 74 average

Sustainability +11 pts 89 here · 78 average

Documented learning +9 pts 83 here · 74 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Evidence of learning impact -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -13 pts 46 here · 59 average

Transferability / replicability -14 pts 46 here · 59 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Evaluation evidence -28 pts 17 here · 45 average

Demonstrated reach -59 pts 17 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Governance, certification & transferability
89 · 64
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Curator validation
86 · 74
Sustainability
89 · 78
Documented learning
83 · 74
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transparency, fairness & accountability
58 · 54
Scalability
67 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 31
Innovation level
63 · 63
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 51
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 28
Evidence of impact / measured results
46 · 59
Transferability / replicability
46 · 59
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 50
Evaluation evidence
17 · 45
Demonstrated reach
17 · 76

Coloured bar: Luxembourg. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Luxembourg's Open-Data Accessibility Monitoring — Six Years of Published Audits, and Only 2 of ~900 Services Compliant · 96

data.europa.eu's eTranslation — Automated Neural Machine Translation of Open-Data Metadata Across 24 EU Languages · 87

Free Public Transport — Luxembourg's Nationwide Fare-Abolition Experiment · 76

Vote Parity · 70

University of Luxembourg - Gender Equality · 70

Actions Positives · 70

Equality in Municipalities · 70

Luxembourg National Talent Strategy — Luxinnovation & ADEM Partnership · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Luxembourg concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more