evidoria

What works in Luxembourg

All catalogues

36
evaluated practices
52/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 33 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Luxembourg

Drawn from: Luxembourg's Open-Data Accessibility Monitoring — Six Years of Published Audits, and Only 2 of ~900 Services Compliant · data.europa.eu's eTranslation — Automated Neural Machine Translation of Open-Data Metadata Across 24 EU Languages · Free Public Transport — Luxembourg's Nationwide Fare-Abolition Experiment · Vote Parity · University of Luxembourg - Gender Equality · Actions Positives · Equality in Municipalities · Luxembourg National Talent Strategy — Luxinnovation & ADEM Partnership

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Governance, certification & transferability +27 pts 90 here · 64 average

Efficiency +18 pts 50 here · 32 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Curator validation +15 pts 88 here · 73 average

Effectiveness +12 pts 78 here · 66 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Documented learning +11 pts 86 here · 74 average

Sustainability +8 pts 86 here · 78 average

Weaknesses

Impact on gender equality -10 pts 60 here · 70 average

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -11 pts 46 here · 57 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Transferability / replicability -16 pts 44 here · 60 average

Evaluated outcomes -18 pts 60 here · 78 average

Evaluation evidence -35 pts 14 here · 49 average

Demonstrated reach -61 pts 14 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Governance, certification & transferability
90 · 64
Efficiency
50 · 32
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Curator validation
88 · 73
Effectiveness
78 · 66
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Documented learning
86 · 74
Sustainability
86 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 38
Achievement / evidence
92 · 87
Scalability
67 · 62
Transparency, fairness & accountability
58 · 54
Innovation level
63 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
22 · 27
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Impact on gender equality
60 · 70
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Evidence of impact / measured results
46 · 57
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Transferability / replicability
44 · 60
Evaluated outcomes
60 · 78
Evaluation evidence
14 · 49
Demonstrated reach
14 · 76

Coloured bar: Luxembourg. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Luxembourg's Open-Data Accessibility Monitoring — Six Years of Published Audits, and Only 2 of ~900 Services Compliant · 96

data.europa.eu's eTranslation — Automated Neural Machine Translation of Open-Data Metadata Across 24 EU Languages · 87

Free Public Transport — Luxembourg's Nationwide Fare-Abolition Experiment · 76

Vote Parity · 70

University of Luxembourg - Gender Equality · 70

Actions Positives · 70

Equality in Municipalities · 70

Luxembourg National Talent Strategy — Luxinnovation & ADEM Partnership · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Luxembourg concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more