evidoria

What works in Luxembourg

All catalogues · Luxembourg profile

12
evaluated practices
43/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 11 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Luxembourg

Drawn from: Luxembourg's Open-Data Accessibility Monitoring — Six Years of Published Audits, and Only 2 of ~900 Services Compliant · National Action Plan for Gender Equality 2018-2023 · Computers For All · Elements of AI Luxembourg — University of Luxembourg and IFEN's National AI-Literacy Course with Dedicated Teacher Support Groups · MyGuichet.lu AI Chatbot — Luxembourg's Multilingual Assistant for 2,000 Government Procedures · Klimabonus Bësch — Forest Ecosystem Services Subsidy (Luxembourg) · Klimabonus Bësch — Luxembourg's National Per-Hectare Payment for Forest Ecosystem Services · Luxembourg's Naturpakt (Pacte Nature) — Audited Certification & State Subsidies for Municipal Biodiversity Action

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Effectiveness +32 pts 100 here · 68 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 37 average

Governance, certification & transferability +28 pts 92 here · 64 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Innovation level +8 pts 70 here · 62 average

Weaknesses

Curator validation -13 pts 60 here · 73 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence -24 pts 25 here · 49 average

Transferability / replicability -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Demonstrated reach -51 pts 25 here · 76 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -57 pts 0 here · 57 average

Score profile vs peers

Effectiveness
100 · 68
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 37
Governance, certification & transferability
92 · 64
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Innovation level
70 · 62
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Scalability beyond pilot
67 · 62
Sustainability
80 · 78
Documented learning
75 · 74
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 48
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
22 · 28
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Curator validation
60 · 73
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Evaluation evidence
25 · 49
Transferability / replicability
33 · 60
Demonstrated reach
25 · 76
Evidence of impact / measured public value
0 · 57

Coloured bar: Luxembourg. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Luxembourg's Open-Data Accessibility Monitoring — Six Years of Published Audits, and Only 2 of ~900 Services Compliant · 96

Computers For All · 56

Elements of AI Luxembourg — University of Luxembourg and IFEN's National AI-Literacy Course with Dedicated Teacher Support Groups · 53

MyGuichet.lu AI Chatbot — Luxembourg's Multilingual Assistant for 2,000 Government Procedures · 47

Klimabonus Bësch — Forest Ecosystem Services Subsidy (Luxembourg) · 47

Klimabonus Bësch — Luxembourg's National Per-Hectare Payment for Forest Ecosystem Services · 40

Luxembourg's Naturpakt (Pacte Nature) — Audited Certification & State Subsidies for Municipal Biodiversity Action · 33

Digi4All Program · 32

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more