evidoria

What works in Mozambique

All catalogues

19
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 17 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Mozambique

Mozambique has made significant progress on political representation and financial inclusion, though gaps remain in both areas. FRELIMO's voluntary 40% women-candidate quota with zebra lists has lifted women's parliamentary representation from 26% (1994) to 43.2% (2024), among the highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. M-Pesa's mobile money platform expanded active users from 1.9 million to 6 million between 2018–2022, reaching roughly 10 million users by mid-2024, though only about 40% of Mozambican adults hold a mobile money account compared to a 64% Sub-Saharan Africa average. The country is also building resilience through youth entrepreneurship support—ideiaLab has trained over 1,000 entrepreneurs annually within a 25,700-member community, with 71% of supported businesses still active one year later—and climate adaptation, with Beira's green-gray flood defence programme achieving a 70% reduction in flood risk in the rehabilitated catchment after Cyclone Idai's 2019 devastation.

Drawn from: Mozambique — FRELIMO's Voluntary Zebra-List Quota (40%) · M-Pesa Mozambique – Vodacom/IFC Financial Inclusion Partnership · ideiaLab — Maputo's Youth Entrepreneurship Incubator and Business-Support Network · Beira's Green-Gray Flood Defence — Rebuilding a Mozambican Port City After Cyclone Idai · Instant Network Schools — Scaling Offline Adaptive Learning for Refugee and Host-Community Students in Nampula, Mozambique · SIRA — Disability-Led Digital Assessment Tool for Humanitarian Crises in Mozambique · Community Multimedia Centres – Radio & ICT Telecentre Network (Mozambique) · Role-Model Videos for Maputo's Microentrepreneurs — NOVAFRICA's Aspirations Field Experiment

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +68 pts 100 here · 32 average

Effectiveness +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +31 pts 58 here · 27 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Evaluation evidence +18 pts 67 here · 49 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / replicability -8 pts 52 here · 60 average

Sustainability -11 pts 67 here · 78 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -12 pts 42 here · 54 average

Evidence of learning impact -15 pts 11 here · 26 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -16 pts 22 here · 38 average

Scalability beyond pilot -16 pts 46 here · 62 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -25 pts 22 here · 47 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 32
Effectiveness
100 · 66
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
58 · 27
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Evaluation evidence
67 · 49
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 48
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
8 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
75 · 74
Governance, certification & transferability
62 · 64
Innovation level
59 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
42 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 57
Transferability / replicability
52 · 60
Sustainability
67 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
42 · 54
Evidence of learning impact
11 · 26
Teacher capability & pedagogy
22 · 38
Scalability beyond pilot
46 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
22 · 47

Coloured bar: Mozambique. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Mozambique — FRELIMO's Voluntary Zebra-List Quota (40%) · 96

M-Pesa Mozambique – Vodacom/IFC Financial Inclusion Partnership · 92

ideiaLab — Maputo's Youth Entrepreneurship Incubator and Business-Support Network · 81

Beira's Green-Gray Flood Defence — Rebuilding a Mozambican Port City After Cyclone Idai · 76

Instant Network Schools — Scaling Offline Adaptive Learning for Refugee and Host-Community Students in Nampula, Mozambique · 73

SIRA — Disability-Led Digital Assessment Tool for Humanitarian Crises in Mozambique · 72

Community Multimedia Centres – Radio & ICT Telecentre Network (Mozambique) · 72

Role-Model Videos for Maputo's Microentrepreneurs — NOVAFRICA's Aspirations Field Experiment · 57

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Mozambique concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more