evidoria

What works in Mozambique

All catalogues

13
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 13 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Mozambique

Mozambique has made significant progress on women's political representation and financial inclusion, though gaps remain. FRELIMO's voluntary 40% women-candidate quota with zebra lists has lifted women's parliamentary representation from 26% (1994) to 43.2% (2024), among the highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. M-Pesa mobile money has expanded financial access, with active registered users growing from 1.9 to 6 million between 2018–2022, though only around 40% of adults hold a mobile-money account compared to a 64% Sub-Saharan Africa average. The country has also invested in climate resilience and education: Beira's green-gray flood-defence programme achieved a 70% reduction in flood risk in its catchment, and Instant Network Schools has scaled offline adaptive learning to 26 centres and over 91,000 cumulative students by November 2025.

Drawn from: Mozambique — FRELIMO's Voluntary Zebra-List Quota (40%) · M-Pesa Mozambique – Vodacom/IFC Financial Inclusion Partnership · Beira's Green-Gray Flood Defence — Rebuilding a Mozambican Port City After Cyclone Idai · Instant Network Schools — Scaling Offline Adaptive Learning for Refugee and Host-Community Students in Nampula, Mozambique · Community Multimedia Centres – Radio & ICT Telecentre Network (Mozambique) · Mozambique FCPF Zambézia Integrated Landscape REDD+ Programme (ZILMP) · Kukumuty — Miombo Woodland Enrichment Carbon Project (Chibabava, Mozambique) · Maluana Science & Technology Park — Mozambique's Slow-Building 'Silicon Valley'

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +36 pts 67 here · 31 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of impact / measured public value -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Governance, certification & transferability -11 pts 53 here · 64 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -15 pts 22 here · 37 average

Scalability beyond pilot -16 pts 48 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact -17 pts 11 here · 28 average

Sustainability -18 pts 60 here · 78 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -25 pts 22 here · 48 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 31
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 76
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 7
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
44 · 50
Transferability / replicability
53 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 50
Innovation level
55 · 63
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 59
Governance, certification & transferability
53 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
22 · 37
Scalability beyond pilot
48 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
11 · 28
Sustainability
60 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Transparency, ethics & data protection
22 · 48

Coloured bar: Mozambique. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Mozambique — FRELIMO's Voluntary Zebra-List Quota (40%) · 96

M-Pesa Mozambique – Vodacom/IFC Financial Inclusion Partnership · 92

Beira's Green-Gray Flood Defence — Rebuilding a Mozambican Port City After Cyclone Idai · 76

Instant Network Schools — Scaling Offline Adaptive Learning for Refugee and Host-Community Students in Nampula, Mozambique · 73

Community Multimedia Centres – Radio & ICT Telecentre Network (Mozambique) · 72

Mozambique FCPF Zambézia Integrated Landscape REDD+ Programme (ZILMP) · 53

Kukumuty — Miombo Woodland Enrichment Carbon Project (Chibabava, Mozambique) · 47

Maluana Science & Technology Park — Mozambique's Slow-Building 'Silicon Valley' · 43

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Mozambique concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more