evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

SIRA — Disability-Led Digital Assessment Tool for Humanitarian Crises in Mozambique

Mozambique · Pemba · See the Mozambique profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 55% 72/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Mozambican disability-rights facilitators co-designed and led fielding of a screen-reader-accessible digital survey that assessed disability among displaced people in Cabo Delgado, finding prevalence far above standard estimates and informing the 2025 response plan.

up to 30 %
Disability prevalence found (incl. psychosocial) (2023-2024)
70 %
Disability prevalence among people over 50 (2023-2024)
1,500+
Households assessed (2023-2024)
SIRA — Disability-Led Digital Assessment Tool for Humanitarian Crises in Mozambique

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Light for the World & FAMOD (Fórum das Associações Moçambicanas de Pessoas com Deficiência)
Period
2023–2024
Keywords
humanitarian response, disability inclusion, digital accessibility, data collection

Context

Mozambique's Cabo Delgado province has been convulsed by conflict since 2017, displacing more than 425,000 people, with almost no reliable data on disability prevalence among the displaced.

Activities

SIRA (Survey for Inclusive Rapid Assessment), an open-source, screen-reader-accessible digital survey combining the Washington Group disability screening questions with open-ended interviews and referral pathways, was co-created with FAMOD (Mozambique's national forum of disabled people's organisations) and the Netherlands' Design Innovation Group, under Light for the World's Elrha-funded 'Data That Matters' project. FAMOD's own Disability Inclusion Facilitators shaped the wording and led field testing.

Results

Field testing in 2023-2024 assessed more than 2,400 people initially and over 1,500 households in Cabo Delgado, finding disability prevalence of up to 30% when psychosocial conditions are included — far above the 16% global estimate typically used in planning, reaching 70% among people over 50.

Conclusions

The findings informed Mozambique's 2025 humanitarian response plan, but SIRA remains a single-region field test: no independent academic evaluation has been published, and whether it is adopted as a standard tool beyond Cabo Delgado remains to be seen.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Elrha-funded ('Data That Matters' project); specific budget not disclosed.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Field tested 2023-2024; informed the 2025 humanitarian response plan.
Staffing & skills
FAMOD Disability Inclusion Facilitators, Netherlands' Design Innovation Group, Light for the World

Conditions for success

  • Co-creation with disabled people's own organisations rather than outside consultants
  • Combining a validated screening tool (Washington Group questions) with local field expertise

Common failure modes

  • No independent academic evaluation published yet
  • Prevalence figures are self-reported by the tool's own implementers

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful