evidoria

What works in Palestine, State of

All catalogues

10
evaluated practices
58/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 9 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Palestine, State of

The evidence shows that Palestine has developed multiple technology and employment interventions to address youth joblessness and skills gaps. Souktel JobMatch reduced college graduates' job searches from about 12 weeks to 1 week or less and raised starting wages by up to 50%, while Gaza Sky Geeks trained over 60,000 Palestinian youth with approximately 85% reaching paid employment or self-employment at an average salary of about $700 monthly. UNESCO's Girls in Tech initiative delivered robotics and AI training to 120 West Bank students (92% girls), producing three national training manuals, though the evidence on employment outcomes for this programme is limited to trainer-reported observations on problem-solving and confidence gains. These practices address persistent Palestinian unemployment (exceeding 30% for youth) and connectivity barriers, particularly for those outside major cities and refugee camps.

Drawn from: Souktel JobMatch — SMS-Based Job Matching for Feature Phones in Palestine · Gaza Sky Geeks · Gaza Sky Geeks — Palestine's Tech Accelerator Rebuilding After War · Girls in Tech — UNESCO's Gender-Transformative Robotics, AI and Programming Initiative in the West Bank · A Validated AI-Literacy Scale and Professional-Development Programme for Pre-Service Teachers in the West Bank · TOKTEN — UNDP's Diaspora Knowledge-Transfer Programme for the Palestinian Territories · SAWA National Helpline for Women and Child Protection · Battir's Hakura Terraces — A 4,000-Year Water-Sharing Commons on UNESCO's Danger List (Palestine)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Equity & inclusion +26 pts 75 here · 50 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +12 pts 50 here · 38 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +10 pts 83 here · 74 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +10 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Transferability / replicability -16 pts 44 here · 60 average

Scalability & sustainability -23 pts 39 here · 62 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Efficiency -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -69 pts 0 here · 69 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 48
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Equity & inclusion
75 · 50
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 38
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 74
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 57
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Innovation level
65 · 62
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Sustainability (ongoing)
80 · 78
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Transferability / replicability
44 · 60
Scalability & sustainability
39 · 62
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Efficiency
0 · 31
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Impact on gender equality
0 · 69
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: Palestine, State of. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Souktel JobMatch — SMS-Based Job Matching for Feature Phones in Palestine · 96

Gaza Sky Geeks · 96

Gaza Sky Geeks — Palestine's Tech Accelerator Rebuilding After War · 67

Girls in Tech — UNESCO's Gender-Transformative Robotics, AI and Programming Initiative in the West Bank · 60

A Validated AI-Literacy Scale and Professional-Development Programme for Pre-Service Teachers in the West Bank · 53

TOKTEN — UNDP's Diaspora Knowledge-Transfer Programme for the Palestinian Territories · 52

SAWA National Helpline for Women and Child Protection · 48

Battir's Hakura Terraces — A 4,000-Year Water-Sharing Commons on UNESCO's Danger List (Palestine) · 40

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Palestine, State of concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more