What works in Moscow
All catalogues · Russia profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Moscow
Moscow's public health system has deployed a city-run marketplace of 50+ vetted AI diagnostic tools across 150 medical facilities, tested in a prospective study of 3,409 brain CT scans that found AI-assisted radiologists achieved 98.91% sensitivity compared to 95.91% for AI alone. The same practice reports that AI-assisted mammography reading has cut interpretation time more than eight-fold. The evidence is limited to diagnostic imaging; no quantified outcomes are reported for other Moscow health or social programmes in the CONTEXT block.
Drawn from: MosMedAI — Moscow's City-Run Marketplace of AI "Second Readers" for Radiology, Tested Against Radiologists Alone · Azbuka Interneta: Digital Literacy for Russian Pensioners · Yandex's National AI-Literacy Training Reaches Over 20,000 Teachers in Russia · AI Challenge & the Russian AI Olympiad — Sber's School-to-University AI Talent Pipeline · Maternity Capital — Russia's Cash-for-Births Policy and Its Gender-Equality Blind Spot · Moscow's AI Facial-Recognition Camera Network — From Traffic Safety Pitch to Dissident and Draft-Evader Tracking
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Sustainability (ongoing) +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value +9 pts 67 here · 57 average
Weaknesses
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average
Governance, capability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average
Transferability / replicability -16 pts 44 here · 60 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average
Innovation level -22 pts 40 here · 62 average
Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average
Equity & inclusion -33 pts 17 here · 50 average
Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average
Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average
Curator validation -73 pts 0 here · 73 average
Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average
Achievement / evidence -88 pts 0 here · 88 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Moscow. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Azbuka Interneta: Digital Literacy for Russian Pensioners · 68
Yandex's National AI-Literacy Training Reaches Over 20,000 Teachers in Russia · 40
AI Challenge & the Russian AI Olympiad — Sber's School-to-University AI Talent Pipeline · 33
Maternity Capital — Russia's Cash-for-Births Policy and Its Gender-Equality Blind Spot · 26
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more