evidoria

What works in Somalia

All catalogues

14
evaluated practices
54/100
average quality score
9%
strong evidence, of 11 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Somalia

Somalia's humanitarian and development landscape shows significant progress in mobile-money infrastructure and cash-transfer systems: 73% of Somali adults used mobile money monthly by 2017, with over 4 million people reached by Baxnaano's national cash-transfer programme by December 2025, supported by digital-literacy training for over 300,000 women. Early warning systems are improving response precision—AI-assisted forecasting helped identify deteriorating hunger in Buur Hakaba before malnutrition peaked, triggering assistance for 48,000 people—while community dialogue on gender-based violence norms shows measurable shifts in attitudes toward survivor support and service confidence in Mogadishu. The evidence quantifies programme reach and some outcome shifts but does not provide comprehensive coverage of Somalia's broader humanitarian, security or development challenges.

Drawn from: Baxnaano Digital & Financial Literacy for Women · EVC Plus: Mobile Money as De Facto Banking Infrastructure in Somalia · HungerMap Live's AI Forecasting Helps Guide Somalia's Emergency Food Response · Communities Care — UNICEF's Community-Dialogue Model to Prevent Gender-Based Violence, Mogadishu · Daariz — AI Voice-Recognition Literacy App for Somali-Speakers in the Horn of Africa · Somalia's 30% Women's Quota in the Federal Parliament — Gains and a Persistent Shortfall · iRise Hub — Mogadishu's First Community Innovation Hub · MIDA — Migration for Development in Africa: Somalia's Diaspora Skills-Return Programme

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Effectiveness +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Innovation level +12 pts 73 here · 62 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -17 pts 47 here · 64 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -18 pts 39 here · 57 average

Scalability -21 pts 41 here · 62 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -22 pts 56 here · 78 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -27 pts 11 here · 38 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -36 pts 11 here · 47 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -39 pts 50 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Effectiveness
100 · 66
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Innovation level
73 · 62
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Transferability / replicability
58 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Governance, capability & sustainability
47 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured results
39 · 57
Scalability
41 · 62
Sustainability (ongoing)
56 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
11 · 38
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Efficiency
0 · 32
Transparency, ethics & data protection
11 · 47
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
50 · 89

Coloured bar: Somalia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Baxnaano Digital & Financial Literacy for Women · 96

EVC Plus: Mobile Money as De Facto Banking Infrastructure in Somalia · 96

HungerMap Live's AI Forecasting Helps Guide Somalia's Emergency Food Response · 93

Communities Care — UNICEF's Community-Dialogue Model to Prevent Gender-Based Violence, Mogadishu · 74

Daariz — AI Voice-Recognition Literacy App for Somali-Speakers in the Horn of Africa · 67

Somalia's 30% Women's Quota in the Federal Parliament — Gains and a Persistent Shortfall · 63

iRise Hub — Mogadishu's First Community Innovation Hub · 52

MIDA — Migration for Development in Africa: Somalia's Diaspora Skills-Return Programme · 52

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Somalia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more