evidoria

What works in El Salvador

All catalogues

11
evaluated practices
52/100
average quality score
12%
strong evidence, of 8 assessed
3
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for El Salvador

El Salvador has piloted several integrated public services and digital-inclusion initiatives. Ciudad Mujer's six co-located service centres increased women's public-services use by 43% and life satisfaction by 8 percentage points in a randomised controlled trial, while Chivo Wallet achieved roughly 50% household download adoption but sustained only ~5% of economy-wide Bitcoin sales, with 60%+ of early downloaders making no further transactions after the sign-up bonus. The country has also launched pilot programmes in teacher training for AI and robotics (ARK Educate trained close to 600 teachers across two departments) and urban heat-island mitigation, though the latter remains at early stage without published quantified heat-reduction outcomes.

Drawn from: Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · Chivo Wallet: El Salvador's Government Digital Payments Rollout · San Salvador Heat-Island Living Lab — IDB 'Cities for All' Co-Creation Pilot · ARK Educate — Cathie Wood's Robotics and AI Teacher-Training Pilot in La Libertad and Morazán, El Salvador · SIGES Alerta Temprana — El Salvador's Self-Audited School Dropout Early-Warning System · FIAES Rio Lempa Watershed PES - El Salvador Debt-for-Nature Conservation Programme · Seguro de Vida Verde — Insurance-Linked Mangrove Restoration in Barra de Santiago, El Salvador · Grok Goes to School — El Salvador's Nationwide xAI Rollout Launches Without a Public Governance Framework

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +33 pts 83 here · 50 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +25 pts 67 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +19 pts 50 here · 31 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +18 pts 56 here · 37 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Scalability & sustainability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evidence of learning impact -17 pts 11 here · 28 average

Transferability / replicability -18 pts 42 here · 60 average

Governance, certification & transferability -31 pts 33 here · 64 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -37 pts 22 here · 59 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
83 · 50
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 76
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
50 · 31
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 37
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Evaluation evidence
50 · 45
Sustainability
83 · 78
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 51
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Innovation level
56 · 63
Equity & inclusion
44 · 52
Scalability & sustainability
56 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
11 · 28
Transferability / replicability
42 · 60
Governance, certification & transferability
33 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured public value
22 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
0 · 54

Coloured bar: El Salvador. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · 100

Chivo Wallet: El Salvador's Government Digital Payments Rollout · 92

Conectadas: Tigo's Mobile Digital-Skills Platform for Women Across Central America · 68

San Salvador Heat-Island Living Lab — IDB 'Cities for All' Co-Creation Pilot · 57

ARK Educate — Cathie Wood's Robotics and AI Teacher-Training Pilot in La Libertad and Morazán, El Salvador · 53

SIGES Alerta Temprana — El Salvador's Self-Audited School Dropout Early-Warning System · 53

FIAES Rio Lempa Watershed PES - El Salvador Debt-for-Nature Conservation Programme · 53

Seguro de Vida Verde — Insurance-Linked Mangrove Restoration in Barra de Santiago, El Salvador · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in El Salvador concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more