Top 50%
in this catalogue (1071 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Evidence of impact / measured results2/3
Two peer-reviewed papers report quantified, calibrated PM2.5 concentrations (46.7 µg/m3 average, 17–68 µg/m3 range) against a co-located reference instrument, but no downstream policy or health outcome is measured.
Transferability / demonstrated replication3/3
The network was deliberately run in parallel across three countries (Burkina Faso, Niger, Guinea) and documented in a dedicated 'lessons learned' paper written to guide future replications.
Scalability2/3
Nineteen sensors across three Burkinabé cities plus additional sites in Niger and Guinea show the model working beyond a single pilot site, though total sensor counts remain modest.
Sustainability / continuity1/3
The lessons-learned paper explicitly documents unresolved maintenance challenges (dust fouling, power outages, calibration drift) over the one-year study window, with no evidence of continued funding after it.
Innovation2/3
Locally training a Gaussian Mixture Regression correction against a TEOM reference is a genuine methodological adaptation for calibrating cheap sensors in a data-scarce Sahelian setting.
Inclusiveness / equity1/3
Coverage spans three cities and urban/suburban/rural sites in Niger, but neither paper describes community engagement or equitable access to the resulting data.
Multi-stakeholder collaboration3/3
Four Burkinabé research institutions (Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, ENS, Université Nazi Boni, IRSAT-CNRST) worked with Niger's monitoring partners and Italy's CNR-IBE across the three-country study.
Evidoria. A Calibrated Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Network Across Burkina Faso's Three Largest Cities. Persistent ID: 635ea73f-9195-4e3e-8b31-771be9a6ed70.