evidoria

What works in Ouagadougou

All catalogues · Burkina Faso profile

9
evaluated practices
49/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 8 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Ouagadougou

Orange Digital Center Burkina Faso delivered 243,000 training hours to 4,869 young people in Ouagadougou during 2025, placing over 100 graduates into employment and incubating 15 startups. A Calibrated Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Network Across Burkina Faso's Three Largest Cities recorded an average PM2.5 concentration of 48.5 µg/m³ in Ouagadougou — approximately nine to ten times the WHO daily guideline — based on 13 sensor sites monitored continuously from November 2021 to November 2022. The evidence demonstrates both digital skills development activity and severe air-quality challenges in the city, though the air-quality data does not extend beyond 2022.

Drawn from: L'OCCITANE pour Elles: Fair Trade Shea Cooperatives Empowering Rural Women · Orange Digital Center Burkina Faso · A Calibrated Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Network Across Burkina Faso's Three Largest Cities · Burkina Faso's Digital Acceleration Project (PACTDIGITAL) — Public-Service Platforms Live Before Rural Broadband Reaches the Displaced · PADEJ-MR Rural Youth Incubator — Burkina Faso's AfDB-Backed Entrepreneurship Programme · SAS Hackeuses — Simplon Burkina Faso's Free AI Specialization for Women Coders in Ouagadougou · AI Traffic-Camera Enforcement — Ouagadougou's Automated Violation Detection and Mobile-Money Fines · Bangr-Wéoogo Urban Park — A 265-Hectare Sahelian Forest Refuge in Ouagadougou, Now Fraying from Neglect

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Equity & inclusion +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Effectiveness +32 pts 100 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +18 pts 67 here · 48 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +9 pts 83 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -31 pts 17 here · 48 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes -79 pts 0 here · 79 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Equity & inclusion
100 · 50
Effectiveness
100 · 68
Impact on gender equality
100 · 71
Curator validation
100 · 73
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 48
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 43
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Sustainability
80 · 78
Scalability beyond pilot
58 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Innovation level
55 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 57
Demonstrated reach
50 · 76
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 28
Governance, capability & sustainability
33 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
17 · 48
Efficiency
0 · 33
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37
Transparency, fairness & accountability
0 · 54
Documented learning
0 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 79

Coloured bar: Ouagadougou. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

L'OCCITANE pour Elles: Fair Trade Shea Cooperatives Empowering Rural Women · 74

Orange Digital Center Burkina Faso · 72

A Calibrated Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Network Across Burkina Faso's Three Largest Cities · 67

Burkina Faso's Digital Acceleration Project (PACTDIGITAL) — Public-Service Platforms Live Before Rural Broadband Reaches the Displaced · 52

PADEJ-MR Rural Youth Incubator — Burkina Faso's AfDB-Backed Entrepreneurship Programme · 48

SAS Hackeuses — Simplon Burkina Faso's Free AI Specialization for Women Coders in Ouagadougou · 47

AI Traffic-Camera Enforcement — Ouagadougou's Automated Violation Detection and Mobile-Money Fines · 33

Bangr-Wéoogo Urban Park — A 265-Hectare Sahelian Forest Refuge in Ouagadougou, Now Fraying from Neglect · 27

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more