evidoria

What works in Burkina Faso

All catalogues

14
evaluated practices
47/100
average quality score
17%
strong evidence, of 12 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Burkina Faso

Drawn from: L'OCCITANE pour Elles: Fair Trade Shea Cooperatives Empowering Rural Women · Orange Digital Center Burkina Faso · Zaï Pits — Farmer-Led Water-Harvesting Restoration of Degraded Cropland, Yatenga, Burkina Faso · A Calibrated Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Network Across Burkina Faso's Three Largest Cities · Burkina Faso's Digital Acceleration Project (PACTDIGITAL) — Public-Service Platforms Live Before Rural Broadband Reaches the Displaced · PADEJ-MR Rural Youth Incubator — Burkina Faso's AfDB-Backed Entrepreneurship Programme · SAS Hackeuses — Simplon Burkina Faso's Free AI Specialization for Women Coders in Ouagadougou · AI Traffic-Camera Enforcement — Ouagadougou's Automated Violation Detection and Mobile-Money Fines

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Equity & inclusion +34 pts 83 here · 50 average

Effectiveness +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +10 pts 83 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Scalability & sustainability -9 pts 53 here · 62 average

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Sustainability -11 pts 67 here · 78 average

Governance, certification & transferability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -14 pts 13 here · 27 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 38 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -30 pts 17 here · 47 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Documented learning -41 pts 33 here · 74 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Equity & inclusion
83 · 50
Effectiveness
100 · 66
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Curator validation
100 · 73
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 43
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
47 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
47 · 48
Innovation level
56 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Scalability & sustainability
53 · 62
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Sustainability
67 · 78
Governance, certification & transferability
50 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
13 · 27
Teacher capability & pedagogy
17 · 38
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 57
Transparency, ethics & data protection
17 · 47
Efficiency
0 · 32
Documented learning
33 · 74
Transparency, fairness & accountability
0 · 54
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: Burkina Faso. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

L'OCCITANE pour Elles: Fair Trade Shea Cooperatives Empowering Rural Women · 74

Digital for Girls and Women (D4GW) — Enabel's Solar-Powered Digital Centres and Skills Training for Rural Women in Burkina Faso's Centre-Est · 72

Orange Digital Center Burkina Faso · 72

Zaï Pits — Farmer-Led Water-Harvesting Restoration of Degraded Cropland, Yatenga, Burkina Faso · 67

A Calibrated Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Network Across Burkina Faso's Three Largest Cities · 67

Burkina Faso's Digital Acceleration Project (PACTDIGITAL) — Public-Service Platforms Live Before Rural Broadband Reaches the Displaced · 52

PADEJ-MR Rural Youth Incubator — Burkina Faso's AfDB-Backed Entrepreneurship Programme · 48

SAS Hackeuses — Simplon Burkina Faso's Free AI Specialization for Women Coders in Ouagadougou · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Burkina Faso concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more