evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Accessible Digital Textbooks — UNICEF, eKitabu and Kenya's Ministry of Education Pilot Inclusive Learning for 130 Students with Disabilities

Kenya · Nairobi · See the Kenya profile · See the Nairobi profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 25% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

UNICEF Kenya, eKitabu and KICD piloted a Universal-Design-for-Learning digital textbook — with audio, Kenyan Sign Language video and simplified-text versions — reaching 130 students with disabilities across 25 schools, before a 2019 challenge added 70 more accessible titles.

130
Students with disabilities reached (pilot) (2017-2019)
25
Schools in pilot (2017-2019)
200,000 USD
Pilot seed funding (2017-2019)
70
New accessible titles produced (2019 challenge) (2019)

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
UNICEF Kenya, eKitabu and the Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD), with Kenya's Ministry of Education
Period
2017–2019 pilot; 2019 Content Development Challenge expansion
Keywords
education publishing, disability inclusion, assistive technology

Context

An estimated 80% of children with disabilities in Kenya are out of school, and the country had few curriculum-aligned learning materials for learners with visual, hearing or intellectual disabilities. From 2017, UNICEF Kenya, the Ministry of Education, KICD and ed-tech company eKitabu worked together to close that gap.

Objectives

The partners aimed to pilot an Accessible Digital Textbook — built on Universal Design for Learning principles — for first-grade environmental activities, produced in audio, Kenyan Sign Language video and simplified-language versions.

Activities

The pilot, seeded with roughly US$200,000 from UNICEF's Innovation Fund, the UN Partnership on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Finnish National Committee for UNICEF and Nokia, reached 130 students with disabilities across 25 schools, with teachers trained in assistive technology and UDL pedagogy. In 2019, eKitabu, the Kenya Publishers Association, the Ministry of Education, KISE and KICD ran a national Content Development Challenge producing 70 new accessible titles.

Results

The pilot reached its target group of 130 students with disabilities across 25 schools, and the 2019 Content Development Challenge extended the approach into a wider publisher ecosystem, producing 70 new accessible titles for the Competency-Based Curriculum.

Conclusions

Reported figures come from UNICEF and eKitabu programme documentation; no independently published evaluation of learning-outcome gains from the pilot was found, so the evidence documents reach and programme design rather than measured learning impact.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
UNICEF Kenya programme staff, eKitabu ed-tech team, KICD curriculum specialists, trained teachers (assistive technology & UDL pedagogy)

Conditions for success

  • multi-format accessible content (audio, Kenyan Sign Language video, simplified text) built on Universal Design for Learning
  • teacher training in assistive technology and UDL pedagogy alongside content production
  • multi-funder seed financing (UNICEF Innovation Fund, UN Partnership on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Finnish National Committee for UNICEF, Nokia)

Common failure modes

  • no independently published evaluation of learning-outcome gains from the pilot
  • reach remained limited to 25 schools/130 students before a separate challenge-based expansion

Where it fits

Governance type
NGO/UN-agency partnership with Ministry of Education
Scale
pilot (25 schools) then national publisher challenge
Income level
low-income (Kenya)

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful