evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

AI-Fabricated 'Resolved' Photos on Jakarta's JAKI Citizen-Complaint App — A Governance Failure and Its Aftermath

Indonesia · Jakarta · See the Indonesia profile · See the Jakarta profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 99% 13/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Officials in East Jakarta used an AI-generated 'after' photo to falsely claim a resident's illegal-parking complaint on the JAKI citizen-reporting app had been resolved. The fabrication was exposed publicly, triggering suspensions and a city-wide ban on AI-generated complaint evi

1
Sub-district head suspended (April 2026)
2
Sub-district officials disciplined (April 2026)
3
PPSU field officers sanctioned (April 2026)
AI-Fabricated 'Resolved' Photos on Jakarta's JAKI Citizen-Complaint App — A Governance Failure and Its Aftermath

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
DKI Jakarta Provincial Government — Public Facilities and Maintenance Agency (PPSU), East Jakarta, and Jakarta Smart City
Period
April 2026 (incident and immediate policy response)
Keywords
AI governance, citizen complaints, digital accountability, public sector AI misuse, municipal government

Context

Jakarta Kini (JAKI) is the government of DKI Jakarta's citizen-services super-app. Its 'Lapor Warga' feature lets residents geotag and report urban problems - illegal parking, damaged public facilities and similar issues - directly to the responsible city agency.

Results

In April 2026, a team from the Public Facilities and Maintenance Agency (PPSU) in the Kalisari sub-district of East Jakarta responded to a resident's repeated complaint about illegally parked cars with two photos meant to show the street had been cleared. A resident noticed that the 'after' photo appeared to have been digitally altered or AI-generated - background elements, including identically positioned motorcyclists, were unchanged between the 'before' and supposedly cleared 'after' images - exposing the resolution as fabricated. Once the manipulation went viral on social media, Jakarta's governor called for an investigation by the Jakarta Inspectorate; the head of the Kalisari sub-district was suspended, two further sub-district officials faced disciplinary action, and three PPSU field officers were sanctioned.

Conclusions

The Jakarta Regional Secretary then issued a circular letter explicitly prohibiting the use of AI-generated images as evidence when closing out citizen complaints on JAKI. This case is logged as an honest, cautionary governance example: a real instance of citizen-facing AI misuse inside an otherwise legitimate and widely used complaint-management platform, paired with a concrete institutional response - investigation, discipline, and a citywide policy ban - that other city governments running similar complaint platforms can learn from.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
PPSU field officers, Kalisari sub-district, East Jakarta, Jakarta Inspectorate (investigation), Jakarta Regional Secretary (policy circular)

Conditions for success

  • citizen vigilance / social-media scrutiny
  • rapid Inspectorate investigation
  • clear disciplinary consequences
  • citywide policy ban on AI-generated evidence

Common failure modes

  • AI-generated 'after' photo used to falsely claim a complaint was resolved
  • manipulation only exposed via citizen social-media scrutiny, not internal controls
  • one sub-district's misuse required a citywide policy response

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful