evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

ALS Thuismeten & Coachen — Nationwide E-Health Home-Monitoring for Motor Neuron Disease

Netherlands · Utrecht · See the Netherlands profile · See the Utrecht profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 23% 92/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A nationwide Dutch e-health platform let people with motor neuron disease self-monitor mood, weight and function from home. 86 of 90 enrolled patients started using it, but only 7 of 9 care teams sustained it long-term.

128 patients
Eligible patients invited (Feb 2020–Dec 2021)
90 patients
Patients who agreed to participate (Feb 2020–Dec 2021)
86 of 90 enrolled (67.2%)
Patients who started using the platform (Feb 2020–Dec 2021)
8.0 /10
Patient satisfaction with care concept (median) (2020–2021 survey)
7.0 /10
Patient satisfaction with app (median) (2020–2021 survey)
88.0 %
Patients intending to continue use for ≥6 months (2020–2021 survey)
7 of 9 teams
Care teams sustaining the service post-pilot (post-2021)
58.8 SUS points (vs ~68 benchmark)
Clinician System Usability Scale score (2020–2021)
76.4 %
Clinicians reporting the platform never became routine practice (2020–2021)
32.0 %
Clinicians reporting extra workload (2020–2021)
ALS Thuismeten & Coachen — Nationwide E-Health Home-Monitoring for Motor Neuron Disease

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
UMC Utrecht ALS Centre / ALS Centrum Nederland
Period
2017–2021
Keywords
healthcare, telehealth, assistive technology, disability

Context

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and related motor neuron diseases progressively remove patients' ability to travel, speak or type, making standard follow-up clinic visits exhausting and infrequent. The ALS Centre at University Medical Center Utrecht built 'ALS Thuismeten & Coachen' (ALS Home-Monitoring & Coaching), an e-health platform letting patients report daily well-being, weekly weight and monthly functional status (ALSFRS) from home via a mobile app, with alerts routed to a coaching nurse practitioner.

Objectives

The aim was to let a rapidly progressing, communication-limiting disease population self-monitor from home rather than travel for infrequent in-person checks, while flagging deterioration to clinical staff early through automated alerts.

Activities

The service moved from a 10-patient pilot in 2017 into regular UMC Utrecht care, then into a nationwide rollout across 10 multidisciplinary ALS rehabilitation teams. Of 128 eligible patients invited between February 2020 and December 2021, 90 agreed to participate and 86 actually started using the app.

Results

Surveyed patients rated the care concept a median 8.0/10 and the app itself 7.0/10, and 88.0% intended to keep using it for at least six more months. However, only 7 of 9 teams that completed the pilot sustained the service afterward — mainly because the app did not integrate with hospitals' electronic health records — and clinicians' own System Usability Scale score for the platform was 58.8, below the commonly used 68-point 'average' benchmark, with 76.4% saying it never became part of routine practice and 32.0% reporting extra workload.

Conclusions

The nationwide evaluation, published in BMC Health Services Research, is a useful case showing that patient-side satisfaction does not by itself guarantee institutional sustainability; the trial also ran in a country with roughly 97% household internet access, so its adoption figures may not transfer directly to lower-connectivity settings.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — App development and hosting plus dedicated coaching nurse practitioner time across 10 rehabilitation teams nationwide; the Netherlands' near-universal (~97%) household internet access lowered connectivity-related costs.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — 10-patient pilot in 2017 at UMC Utrecht, moving into regular care, then a nationwide rollout inviting 128 eligible patients between February 2020 and December 2021, evaluated in a 2022 published study.
Staffing & skills
A dedicated coaching nurse practitioner monitoring automated alerts, 10 multidisciplinary ALS rehabilitation teams nationwide, UMC Utrecht ALS Centre as the platform's clinical and technical owner

Conditions for success

  • Integration of the app with hospitals' electronic health records
  • Clinical teams building the platform into routine care workflows, not just offering it alongside existing processes
  • High baseline household internet access enabling home-based reporting

Common failure modes

  • Lack of EHR integration was the main reason 2 of 9 teams discontinued the service after the pilot
  • Only 23.6% of clinicians felt the platform became part of routine practice, and 32.0% reported it added workload
  • Clinician System Usability Scale score (58.8) fell below the commonly used 68-point 'average' benchmark despite high patient satisfaction

Where it fits

Governance type
academic medical centre-led healthcare system
Scale
national (Netherlands)
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful