evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Ariel Sharon Park — Rehabilitating Tel Aviv's Hiriya Landfill into an 800-Hectare Ecological Park

Israel · Tel Aviv · See the Israel profile · See the Tel Aviv profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 10% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Israel's largest landfill — 25 million tonnes dumped 1952–1998 — was capped and redesigned by architect Peter Latz into an 800-hectare park. Methane from dozens of gas wells is converted to electricity; a bioplastic cap lets flora and fauna re-establish above the waste.

~25 million tonnes
Landfill waste accumulated (1952-1998)
~800 hectares
Park area
Ariel Sharon Park — Rehabilitating Tel Aviv's Hiriya Landfill into an 800-Hectare Ecological Park

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ariel Sharon Park Company (Government of Israel / Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality)
Period
2004–2023
Keywords
waste management, landscape architecture, urban parks, ecological restoration

Context

From 1952 to 1998 the Hiriya site accumulated an estimated 25 million tonnes of waste as Israel's largest municipal landfill.

Activities

An international design competition (14 entries, won 2004 by Peter Latz) led to remediation construction from 2011-2023: dozens of methane gas-extraction wells feeding an electricity plant, a bioplastic barrier layer, and an on-site recycling and transfer station processing several thousand tonnes of waste a day.

Results

The roughly 800-hectare Ariel Sharon Park opened to the public from 2014, with vegetation and wildlife visibly re-established across the capped landform.

Conclusions

No independent funding or total-cost breakdown, species inventory, or fire-resilience data were found in public sources, so ecological recovery here is documented qualitatively rather than through counted metrics.

Implementation
Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Ariel Sharon Park Company (Government of Israel / Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality), Peter Latz landscape-architecture team

Conditions for success

  • competition-led, multi-decade delivery model
  • on-site gas-to-energy conversion to manage ongoing methane production

Common failure modes

  • no independent cost breakdown or biodiversity monitoring published

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful