evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Australian Framework for Generative AI in Schools — A National Six-Principle Standard Set by All State and Territory Ministers

Australia · Canberra · See the Australia profile · See the Canberra profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 73% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

In October 2023 Australia's Education Ministers approved a six-principle, 25-statement national framework for generative AI in schools, backed by AU$1 million for privacy/security resources and implemented from Term 1 2024 nationwide.

6
Guiding principles
25
Guiding statements
1 AU$ million
Funding for privacy/security guidance (committed October 2023)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Australian Government Department of Education (National AI in Schools Taskforce)
Period
2023–present
Keywords
AI governance, K-12 education policy, data privacy

Context

In February 2023, Australia's federal, state and territory Education Ministers agreed to prioritise a coordinated response to generative AI in school education, creating the National AI in Schools Taskforce with representatives from every jurisdiction, school sector, Education Services Australia, the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, and the Australian Education Research Organisation.

Activities

On 5 October 2023, Ministers approved the resulting Australian Framework for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Schools: six principles, supported by 25 guiding statements, intended to guide school leaders, teachers, support staff, EdTech providers, parents and students toward responsible and ethical use. The document was shaped by consultation with teachers, students, unions, industry, academics and parent bodies across public, Catholic and independent sectors. Implementation began in Term 1 2024. Ministers committed AU$1 million for Education Services Australia to update national privacy and security guidance for schools, reflecting a specific concern about student data protection raised during the framework's development.

Results

The framework itself is a set of non-binding principles rather than a funded pedagogical programme. The sources reviewed report no independent evaluation of learning outcomes attributable to the framework, and its force depends on each state and sector translating the six principles into local policy and enforcement.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
National AI in Schools Taskforce (representatives from every state/territory and school sector), Education Services Australia (privacy/security guidance update), Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, Australian Education Research Organisation

Conditions for success

  • Unanimous agreement across all federal, state and territory Education Ministers
  • Broad multi-stakeholder consultation (teachers, students, unions, industry, academics, parent bodies) prior to adoption
  • Dedicated funding for privacy and security guidance updates

Common failure modes

  • Non-binding principles depend on each state and sector translating them into local policy and enforcement, with no independent outcome evaluation reported

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful