evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Australia's AI Impact Assessment Tool — Mandatory Risk Screening for Every Commonwealth AI Use Case

Australia · Canberra · See the Australia profile · See the Canberra profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 35% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 15 Dec 2025, Australia's DTA requires every non-corporate Commonwealth agency to screen new AI use cases via a 12-section impact assessment tool checked against AI Ethics Principles; a pilot already surfaced risks existing governance had missed.

12
Impact assessment tool sections
Australia's AI Impact Assessment Tool — Mandatory Risk Screening for Every Commonwealth AI Use Case

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), Australian Government
Period
2025–2026
Keywords
AI governance, public sector policy, risk assessment, digital government

Context

As Australian government agencies scaled up their use of AI, oversight remained fragmented: individual agencies assessed risk against internal frameworks of varying rigour, with no common, mandatory checkpoint aligned to the national AI Ethics Principles.

Activities

On 1 December 2025 the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) published version 2.0 of the Policy for the Responsible Use of AI in Government, taking effect on 15 December 2025 and applying to all non-corporate Commonwealth entities. Its centrepiece is a mandatory AI impact assessment tool: a structured, 12-section questionnaire that agencies must complete for every in-scope AI use case, with a named responsible officer accountable for coordinating each assessment. The tool complements, rather than replaces, agencies' existing risk-management and legal processes, and agencies have until 15 December 2026 to bring all in-scope use cases into compliance.

Results

Before the mandate took effect, the DTA piloted the tool with agencies: participants reported that the structured assessment surfaced fairness, transparency and explainability risks that their existing governance arrangements had not caught. The pilot also found friction -- some agencies said their legal teams would need several weeks to source external advice to complete certain sections -- feedback the DTA says it used to revise the tool before the government-wide rollout.

Conclusions

The evidence here is necessarily early: the tool is barely a year old, the compliance deadline for full government-wide coverage falls at the end of 2026, and unlike the UK's Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard or Canada's Algorithmic Impact Assessment registry, there is no public register yet of completed assessments, so outside scrutiny of individual use cases is not yet possible.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Policy version 2.0 published 1 December 2025, effective 15 December 2025; agencies have until 15 December 2026 for full compliance.
Staffing & skills
Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), Australian Government, named responsible officers (technical, governance, risk, policy or project staff) in each Commonwealth entity

Conditions for success

  • a mandatory, standardised 12-section assessment applied across all non-corporate Commonwealth entities
  • a named accountable officer per assessment
  • pilot-testing and revision before mandatory rollout
  • alignment with national AI Ethics Principles

Common failure modes

  • pilot agencies reported needing several weeks to source external legal advice to complete some sections
  • no public register of completed assessments yet exists, limiting external scrutiny

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful