evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Better Reykjavik — Open Municipal Idea Platform

Iceland · Reykjavik · See the Iceland profile · See the Reykjavik profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 10% 86/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2010, Reykjavik crowdsourcing platform registered 70,000+ participants (58 % of residents), collected 10,000+ ideas, realised nearly 700 citizen projects and allocates 450 million ISK (~3.5 M) annually — ~6 % of capital investment — through participatory budget votes.

70,000+ people
Participants since launch (2010-present)
58 %
Share of registered municipal population participating (2010-present)
10,000+ ideas
Ideas submitted (cumulative)
21,000+ debate points
Debate points logged (cumulative)
~700 projects
Citizen-proposed projects built or under construction (cumulative)
64 %
Proposals reaching deliberation accepted by city council (n/a)
450 million ISK
Annual participatory budget (annual)
4-6 %
Participatory budget as share of capital investment budget (annual)
Better Reykjavik — Open Municipal Idea Platform

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
City of Reykjavik / Citizens Foundation
Period
2010–present
Region (NUTS)
IS00
Keywords
Civic technology / Participatory governance

Context

Better Reykjavik (Betra Reykjavik) was launched in May 2010 by the City of Reykjavik in partnership with the Citizens Foundation as the world's first city-wide online participatory-democracy platform.

Objectives

Enable citizens to submit ideas, debate them and vote, feeding directly into municipal decision-making and a dedicated participatory budget.

Activities

Citizens submit ideas, debate them (10,000+ ideas and 21,000+ debate points logged) and vote; across annual one-month idea-generation cycles, roughly 39,000 visitors (37% of the voting population) engage each April, with around 5,800 logged-in users casting votes in the 2019 cycle. The platform also hosts participatory budgeting, with residents allocating 450 million ISK (~EUR 3.5 million) annually.

Results

More than 70,000 people -- over 58% of the 120,000 registered municipal population -- have participated since launch. Close to 700 citizen-proposed projects have been built or are under construction across all Reykjavik neighbourhoods as a direct result of platform votes; the city council has accepted approximately 64% of proposals reaching deliberation. The participatory budget represents approximately 4-6% of the city's capital investment budget, with 12.5% of the population participating in budget votes.

Conclusions

The Citizens Foundation has adapted the open-source model to cities and regions in over 20 countries, and Better Reykjavik has been cited by the OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation, the Council of Europe's Intercultural Cities Programme, and participatory-democracy scholars as a global benchmark for digital civic engagement at city scale.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Digital platform operating cost plus an annual participatory capital budget of 450 million ISK (~EUR 3.5 million), approximately 4-6% of the city's capital investment budget.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Launched May 2010; 15+ years of continuous operation, with annual idea-generation cycles each April.
Staffing & skills
City of Reykjavik, Citizens Foundation (platform developer/operator)

Conditions for success

  • Binding integration into the city's annual capital-budget cycle
  • Open-source platform enabling low-cost replication
  • Sustained multi-year city commitment to honour accepted proposals

Common failure modes

  • Primarily digital participation channel poses access barriers for elderly, digitally excluded or non-Icelandic-speaking residents

Where it fits

Governance type
municipal government partnership with a non-profit platform operator
Scale
city-wide (Reykjavik, ~120,000 residents)
Income level
high-income country (Iceland)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes CERV — Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 95

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy

Austria

Vienna's long-term, legally-binding smart-city strategy (first 2011, updated 2019/2022) aligning resource conservation, quality of life and social inclusion with annual …

★ 95

Smart Open Lisboa

Portugal

Smart Open Lisboa (SOL) is a startup program focused on the validation and integration of innovative solutions meant to upgrade …