evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Building Blocks — How Jordan's Refugee Camps Turned an Iris Scan into a Once-Only Aid Registration

Jordan · Za'atari · See the Jordan profile

Top 62% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2016, WFP's Building Blocks lets Syrian refugees in Jordan pay for food with an iris scan matched to their existing UNHCR record, no second registration, moving $37M in aid and cutting transaction fees ~98% — though a 2021 letter challenged the data-sharing's transparency.

Building Blocks — How Jordan's Refugee Camps Turned an Iris Scan into a Once-Only Aid Registration

Details

Promoter
World Food Programme (WFP) & UNHCR
Period
2013–2021
Keywords
humanitarian aid, biometrics, identity, cash assistance, refugee services

Description

Za'atari camp was the site of UNHCR's 2013 Biometric Identity Management System (BIMS) rollout, the first large-scale iris-based registration of refugees, designed so a person only needed to enrol once to be recognised across UNHCR's services.

From 2016, the World Food Programme's Building Blocks platform reused that same UNHCR biometric record instead of collecting refugees' data again: an iris scan at camp supermarkets is matched against the existing UNHCR database and the entitlement is settled on a private blockchain ledger — an operational once-only principle applied across two UN agencies. By 2018 the platform had expanded from Azraq camp to Za'atari and King Abdullah Park, supporting $37 million in cash-based assistance, and WFP reported the approach cut financial transaction/bank fees by around 98% versus its previous voucher and e-card system; an earlier phase recorded over 1.1 million transactions moving $23.5 million in entitlements.

The data reuse has not gone unquestioned. In a May 2021 open letter, the digital-rights group Access Now pressed UNHCR and WFP for clarity on whether Jordanian authorities can access the shared biometric servers — noting UNHCR's 2014 donation of 108 iris scanners to Jordan's Ministry of Interior — and on exactly what data flows to the private partners IrisGuard and Cairo Amman Bank under the Common Cash Facility. As far as public records show, those questions have not been fully and publicly answered, leaving a real transparency gap alongside the programme's operational gains.

Read the full analysis: https://wfpusa.org/news/blockchain-tech-helps-refugees-grocery-shop-in-conflict-zones/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful