Since 2004, Indonesia's oldest running watershed PES scheme has paid Cidanau farmer groups (Banten) via intermediary FKDC, funded by industrial buyer PT Krakatau Tirta Industri, starting at Rp3.5M/ha/yr on a 50-ha pilot and scaling toward ~3,364 ha at ~US$100/ha/yr.
50 ha
Pilot area (2004-2005) (2004-2005)
3,500,000 Rp/ha/year
Pilot payment rate (2004-2005)
175,000,000 Rp
Pilot total payment (2004-2005)
~3,364 ha
Scaled-up target area (target, not yet reached)
~100 US$/ha/year
Scaled-up target payment rate (target, not yet reached)
Details
Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Forum Komunikasi DAS Cidanau (FKDC) / PT Krakatau Tirta Industri
Period
2004-present
Keywords
industrial water supply, smallholder forestry, watershed protection, payment for environmental services
Context
The Cidanau watershed in Banten Province, western Java, supplies raw water to PT Krakatau Tirta Industri (KTI), the water company serving the Krakatau Steel industrial estate and surrounding municipalities around Cilegon. Upstream deforestation and smallholder farming in the catchment raised concerns about sedimentation and dry-season flow reliability for KTI's intake. The Cidanau Watershed Communication Forum (FKDC), established in 1998 as a multi-stakeholder body, brokered a payment-for-environmental-services contract in which KTI pays upstream Forest Farmer Groups to maintain tree cover on their land.
Results
The scheme launched as a 50-hectare pilot in 2004-2005 at Rp3,500,000 per hectare per year (Rp175,000,000 total for the pilot), with a scaled-up target of roughly 3,364 hectares at about US$100 per hectare per year once the intermediary and buyer's contributions were combined. Cidanau is widely documented as the oldest continuously operating PES scheme in Indonesia, cited as a reference case in national PES policy discussions and in multiple IIED, CBD and peer-reviewed studies spanning two decades of operation.
Conclusions
Independent academic reviews, including a 2024 governance study, describe persistent implementation gaps: an incomplete transition from the 50-hectare pilot to full watershed-scale payments, uneven participation among farmer groups, and financing that has fallen short of the estimated full-scale budget. The scheme should be read as a long-running but only partially scaled model rather than a fully matured, watershed-wide programme.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Pilot: Rp3,500,000/ha/year (Rp175,000,000 total for 50 ha, 2004-2005); scaled target of about US$100/ha/year across roughly 3,364 ha, combining intermediary and buyer contributions.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Running continuously since 2004 (20+ years); the scale-up from pilot to full watershed target remains incomplete per 2024 research.
Staffing & skills
Forum Komunikasi DAS Cidanau (FKDC) - multi-stakeholder intermediary/broker, PT Krakatau Tirta Industri (KTI) - buyer/financier, Upstream Forest Farmer Groups - service providers
Conditions for success
A multi-stakeholder forum (FKDC, established 1998) providing an intermediary structure to broker the buyer-seller contract
A single identifiable industrial buyer (KTI) with a direct sedimentation/dry-season flow interest funding payments
20+ years of continuous operation, recognised as a national reference model in Indonesian PES policy
Common failure modes
An incomplete transition from the 50-ha pilot to the targeted roughly 3,364 ha full watershed scale, per independent 2024 governance research
Uneven participation among upstream farmer groups
Financing has fallen short of the estimated full-scale budget needed to cover the whole watershed
Where it fits
Governance type
multi-stakeholder forum brokering a buyer-seller PES contract
Scale
sub-watershed (pilot 50 ha, target roughly 3,364 ha)
Income level
lower-middle income (Indonesia)
Commonly funded by
Own resources / municipal budget
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.