Top 41%
in this catalogue (890 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced1/3
Mangroves sequester blue carbon, but the scheme pays for harvest compliance and monitoring, not verified carbon removals, so the carbon benefit is plausible but unmeasured.
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced2/3
Associations run restocking, ecosystem monitoring and surveillance under verified compliance contracts, but population-level mollusk or mangrove-cover recovery data are not yet published.
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control1/3
Mangrove protection supports coastal water quality and sediment retention, but the programme reports no water-quality or erosion metrics.
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced0/3
No fire-related component or evidence exists in this mangrove/marine PES scheme.
Governance, certification & transferability3/3
A formal multi-institutional cooperation agreement (MINAE, SINAC, FONAFIFO, INCOPESCA, FUNBAM) with quarterly, compliance-contingent payments and dedicated biological field oversight evidences strong, auditable governance.
Evidoria. Costa Rica's Marine Payment for Environmental Services — Mangrove Conservation by Gulf of Nicoya Mollusk Harvesters. Persistent ID: c564c3d5-887c-4522-8417-24ce2bd43a39.