Kazakhstan National AI in Education Standards 2025–2029
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan approved joint ministerial AI-in-education standards (2025–2029) on ethics, data protection and academic integrity for 4.1 million pupils; AI entered …
Denmark · Copenhagen · See the Denmark profile · See the Copenhagen profile
Top 70% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
A ministry-appointed expert group chaired by Birgitte Vedersø recommended keeping unaided exams while adding case, portfolio and project exams where AI is allowed; the minister announced four school trials of new exam methods from 2025.
Denmark's then Minister for Children and Education, Mattias Tesfaye, appointed an expert group on ChatGPT and other digital aids, chaired by Birgitte Vedersø (independent consultant, former head of Danske Gymnasier). Its preliminary recommendations (December 2023) focused mainly on controlling and monitoring the exam situation. Its final recommendations, presented in late April 2024 and covering folkeskole and youth and adult education, moved on to exam design.
The group proposed three exam formats that can incorporate AI: case-based exams (fully or partly in groups, in the classroom so students can get teacher help), portfolio exams and project exams. It stressed that exams without aids should remain: 'We still believe that it's important to test students in the old-fashioned way without aids', and argued that if the sole focus is the end product it is 'incredibly easy to cheat with AI'. It also judged it unrealistic to expect reliable plagiarism checkers for language models, which is why assessment design rather than detection is the centre of the approach.
The minister said changes would be unlikely before spring 2025 and announced four trials for schools to test new exam methods in 2025, with possible wider use in 2026. A later EVA mapping (March 2025) notes that its identified exam paths reflect the expert group's recommendation of exams that test both with and without digital aids.
Evidence caveats: the recommendations are an expert policy judgment, not an evaluation of outcomes; the results of the trials are not covered here, and an AI researcher quoted in the press noted that teachers' knowledge of appropriate chatbot use is still not well developed. The Danish gymnasium association later called ministry initiatives built on the group's proposals 'quite inadequate' for the shift AI represents in upper secondary schools.
Read the full analysis: https://www.thelocal.dk/20240424/how-ai-could-be-used-for-future-exams-in-danish-schools
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan approved joint ministerial AI-in-education standards (2025–2029) on ethics, data protection and academic integrity for 4.1 million pupils; AI entered …
Nigeria
A World Bank RCT in Edo State, Nigeria found 800 secondary students using Microsoft Copilot in teacher-guided after-school English classes …
Bulgaria
Survey of 10,038 pupils, 1,767 teachers and 210 principals in 63 schools: 94.7% of pupils use AI, but only 6.5% …
France
France's data-protection authority CNIL published GDPR-based FAQs (June 2025) on how teachers may and may not use AI systems, then …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.