evidoria

← Back to browse

Literature / resource Imported

Gender analysis in the 2021 municipal elections - Do development and urbanism influence the greater political participation of women?

Croatia · unspecified · National · See the Croatia profile

This study focuses on gender analyzes of electoral processes and in 2021 elections in Croatia. It treats candidacies and electoral results from the perspective of balanced representation, with the desire to verify whether there are significant differences in women's political par

10
Local self-government units sampled per development group

Details

Promoter
CESI – Center for Education, Counselling and Research — website
Power domain
Political Power
Methods / tools
Awareness-raising, Monitoring
Keywords
electoral processes, balanced representation, quotas, political participation, urban-rural dichotomy

Context

This CESI (Center for Education, Counselling and Research) study analyses the gender composition of candidates, voters and elected officials in Croatia's 2021 local elections, examining whether women's political participation differs across the urban-rural and developed-underdeveloped dichotomies. Using a development-index calculation, the study sampled the first 10 local self-government units from each development group, further classified according to administrative and numerical criteria.

Results

The study tested the hypothesis, drawn from post-election statistics, that women's political participation would be greater in urban and developed areas than in rural and less developed ones. Findings show that women's local political participation is more complex than the urban-rural and developed-underdeveloped dichotomies suggest: these criteria were not an adequate predictor of women's political participation, contradicting the initial hypothesis.

Conclusions

The study notes that limited resources for the analysis required restricting the sample to the first 10 local self-government units per development group, a constraint that shaped how the hypothesis could be tested.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful