evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Gewog Community Centres (CCs)

Bhutan · Thimphu · See the Bhutan profile

Bhutan built 182 of a planned 205 rural gewog Community Centres offering broadband, e-government and basic computer services, but 2014 field reporting found many centres underused or unconnected — a cautionary case on last-mile telecentre sustainability, even as a 2025 India-fund

Gewog Community Centres (CCs)

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Information and Communications, Royal Government of Bhutan (with Asian Development Bank / SASEC)
Period
2009–present
Keywords
rural connectivity, e-government access, telecentres

Description

Bhutan's Ministry of Information and Communications set out in 2009 to establish one Community Centre (CC) in each of the country's 205 gewogs (sub-districts), extending fibre connectivity built under the Asian Development Bank-supported SASEC Village Network component down to local level. Centres were intended to offer both community-to-citizen services — photocopying, scanning, printing, basic computer courses — and government-to-citizen services such as civil registration, forest permits and employment applications, with day-to-day operation later placed under Bhutan Postal Corporation.

According to ITU and ADB/SASEC project records, 182 of the planned 205 Community Centres had been established, of which 130 were connected via broadband internet. However, Bhutan Broadcasting Service's 2014 field reporting from Trashigang found many centres non-functional, under-equipped or entirely unconnected — one gewog, Kangpara, had none — with operators undertrained and operational authority disputed between gewog administrations and Bhutan Postal Corporation. Paro Dzongkhag's own service data records average footfall of only 3 to 15 visits per centre per day.

In June 2025, the Prime Minister's Office launched a parallel Integrated Service and Contact Centre programme, funded by the Government of India under Bhutan's 13th Five-Year Plan, explicitly framed as complementing rather than replacing the existing Community Centres and offering 56 services from 49 agencies, with plans to extend further into gewogs and CCs.

No rigorous independent impact evaluation of the Community Centres — covering literacy gains, internet-penetration change or aggregate beneficiaries — was found in publicly available sources; the documented evidence instead shows a large but only partially functional rural access network, making this a genuine cautionary case on the operational sustainability challenges of last-mile telecentre programmes.

Read the full analysis: https://www.bbs.bt/229781/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful