evidoria

What works in Bhutan

All catalogues

20
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
11%
strong evidence, of 19 assessed
1
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Bhutan

Drawn from: Bhutan's Education Technology Framework — Campus-Wide Connectivity and the Digital Lopen Teacher Cascade · UPSHIFT Bhutan — UNICEF's Schools-Based Youth Social-Innovation Programme · Bhutan for Life — Project Finance for Permanence (Bhutan) · Bhutan National Digital Identity (NDI) – Self-Sovereign ID for All Citizens · Jigme Namgyel Wangchuck Super FabLab — Bhutan's National Digital Fabrication Network · RENEW — Bhutan's Royally Founded Network of Community Centres for Survivors of Gender-Based Violence · UNICEF, Bhutan's Ministry of Education & PubCoder — AI-Automated Accessible Digital Textbooks for Students with Disabilities · Eduten AI-Powered Maths Platform — Bhutan's National Grade 4–6 Rollout After a Controlled Pilot

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +20 pts 58 here · 38 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +17 pts 44 here · 27 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +15 pts 89 here · 74 average

Evidence of learning impact +15 pts 42 here · 26 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +11 pts 58 here · 47 average

Evaluation evidence +11 pts 60 here · 49 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, fairness & accountability -9 pts 44 here · 54 average

Demonstrated reach -16 pts 60 here · 76 average

Effectiveness -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -20 pts 50 here · 70 average

Evaluated outcomes -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Score profile vs peers

Curator validation
100 · 73
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Teacher capability & pedagogy
58 · 38
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
44 · 27
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 74
Evidence of learning impact
42 · 26
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Transparency, ethics & data protection
58 · 47
Evaluation evidence
60 · 49
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
56 · 48
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Documented learning
80 · 74
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 6
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Scalability & sustainability
63 · 62
Innovation level
62 · 62
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
44 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 57
Sustainability
70 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
44 · 54
Demonstrated reach
60 · 76
Effectiveness
50 · 66
Impact on gender equality
50 · 70
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 78
Efficiency
0 · 32

Coloured bar: Bhutan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Bhutan's Education Technology Framework — Campus-Wide Connectivity and the Digital Lopen Teacher Cascade · 92

UPSHIFT Bhutan — UNICEF's Schools-Based Youth Social-Innovation Programme · 91

Bhutan for Life — Project Finance for Permanence (Bhutan) · 87

Bhutan National Digital Identity (NDI) – Self-Sovereign ID for All Citizens · 80

Jigme Namgyel Wangchuck Super FabLab — Bhutan's National Digital Fabrication Network · 76

RENEW — Bhutan's Royally Founded Network of Community Centres for Survivors of Gender-Based Violence · 74

UNICEF, Bhutan's Ministry of Education & PubCoder — AI-Automated Accessible Digital Textbooks for Students with Disabilities · 73

Eduten AI-Powered Maths Platform — Bhutan's National Grade 4–6 Rollout After a Controlled Pilot · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Bhutan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more