evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

GITA & GENIE — Georgia's National Innovation Ecosystem Programme

Georgia · Tbilisi · See the Georgia profile · See the Tbilisi profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 61% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Georgia's state innovation agency ran a $40M World Bank programme (GENIE, 2016–2023) that financed 138 startups, created 2,127 jobs (50% women) and mobilised $105M in private investment — 15x target — though a 2019 World Bank review flagged chronic understaffing.

138
Startups financed (2016-2023)
2,127 (50% women)
Jobs created (2016-2023)
US$105 million (15x target)
Private investment mobilised (2016-2023)
US$39 million (8x target)
Beneficiary firm revenue generated (2016-2023)
37 of 200+
Startups raising additional capital (2019-2021)
GITA & GENIE — Georgia's National Innovation Ecosystem Programme

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Georgia's Innovation and Technology Agency (GITA)
Period
2014–present (GENIE programme: 2016–2023)
Keywords
innovation policy, technology commercialisation, startup incubation, digital skills training

Context

Georgia's Innovation and Technology Agency (GITA) was established in 2014 under the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development to build the country's innovation infrastructure — matching-grant funds, a Tbilisi Technology Park, FabLabs and regional incubators. From 2016 to 2023, GITA implemented the World Bank-financed Georgia National Innovation Ecosystem (GENIE) project, a $40 million IBRD operation designed to connect entrepreneurs and researchers to markets and finance.

Objectives

GENIE combined matching grants, acceleration programmes and digital-skills training aimed at under-served regions and women entrepreneurs, alongside continued operation of the Tbilisi Technology Park and associated FabLab network.

Results

According to the World Bank's November 2025 results brief, GENIE financed 138 startups, created 2,127 jobs (50% held by women), reached 52,000 direct beneficiaries (50% women) and trained over 3,100 people in digital skills. It mobilised US$105 million in private investment — 15 times the project's target — and beneficiary firms generated US$39 million in revenue, eight times the target. Independent Georgian business-press reporting (Investor.ge, 2022) corroborates rapid capital-raising among GITA-backed firms: of 200+ startups invested in across all GITA programmes, 37 went on to raise additional capital, with the cumulative amount growing from 7 million GEL (2019) to 200 million GEL (2021).

Conclusions

The World Bank is both the funder and the primary evaluator of GENIE, so its results brief is not fully independent, though the Investor.ge figures corroborate the broad growth trend. A 2019 World Bank working paper on innovation agencies explicitly found that GITA 'has not been able to maintain a capable core staff... due to irregular and insufficient funding' — a documented institutional weakness that predates but likely affected GENIE's implementation period.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — US$40 million World Bank IBRD loan financed the 2016-2023 GENIE project; GITA's continuing operations are funded by Georgia's Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — GITA established 2014; GENIE ran 2016-2023 (7-year World Bank-financed project); GITA continues operating per November 2025 World Bank reporting.
Staffing & skills
GITA core government staff (Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development), World Bank project task team, Tbilisi Technology Park / FabLab network staff

Conditions for success

  • stable, adequately funded core agency staff
  • access to acceleration and matching-grant partners
  • regional incubator/FabLab network to reach under-served regions

Common failure modes

  • chronic understaffing: a 2019 World Bank working paper found GITA 'has not been able to maintain a capable core staff... due to irregular and insufficient funding'

Where it fits

Governance type
national government agency, World Bank co-financed
Scale
national

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful