evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Group-Based Management Consulting for Auto-Parts SMEs — Colombia's CNP Productivity Trial

Colombia · Bogotá · See the Colombia profile · See the Bogotá profile

Evidence: Randomised controlled trial Top 61% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A World Bank RCT assigned 159 Colombian auto-parts firms to one-on-one consulting, cheaper group consulting via Centro Nacional de Productividad, or control. Both raised management scores 8–10 points; only group consulting (~3x cheaper) drove significant employment gains.

159 firms
Firms in the trial (2013-2017)
53 firms
Firms per arm (2013-2017)
28,950 US$ (plus US$3,553 diagnostic)
Cost per firm, one-on-one consulting
10,500 US$
Cost per firm, group consulting
8-10 percentage points
Management-practice score increase (both arms)
3-7 workers (8-15%)
Employment increase, group-consulting arm
8-9% p=0.12
Sales increase, group-consulting arm (not statistically significant)
69 %
Sample retention through final data collection

Details

Promoter
Centro Nacional de Productividad (CNP)
Period
2013–2017
Keywords
management consulting, auto-parts manufacturing, SME productivity, business advisory

Context

Between 2013 and 2017, Colombia's Centro Nacional de Productividad (CNP) worked with World Bank researchers to run a randomised controlled trial testing two ways of delivering management consulting to second-tier auto-parts suppliers across Antioquia, Cundinamarca, Valle del Cauca and the Eje Cafetero. 159 firms were randomly split into three arms of 53: intensive one-on-one consulting, a cheaper group-based consulting model adapted from agricultural-extension methods, and a control group.

Results

Both treatment arms raised management-practice scores by a similar 8-10 percentage points, about a third of the effect size found in comparable Indian studies. Only the group-consulting arm — roughly a third of the cost of one-on-one consulting — produced a statistically significant increase in firm size (employment up 3-7 workers, or 8-15%) and a non-significant sales increase of 8-9% (p=0.12); individually-consulted firms' outcomes were not statistically distinguishable from the control group. Neither arm showed significant gains in productivity, defect rates or inventory management, and 69% of the original sample was retained through final data collection.

Conclusions

The trial is best read as a direct, randomised cost-effectiveness comparison between two delivery modes for SME management upgrading, rather than proof that either approach transforms firm performance outright; delayed rollout of the group treatment (by more than a year) may also have dampened its measured effect.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Centro Nacional de Productividad (CNP) as implementing non-profit, World Bank research team (Leonardo Iacovone, William Maloney, David McKenzie) as evaluation partners, Management consultants delivering one-on-one or group sessions to enrolled firms

Conditions for success

  • Random assignment across three arms enabling a credible causal comparison
  • A cheaper group-based delivery model adapted from agricultural-extension methods to control costs
  • Sustained firm engagement — 69% of the original sample was retained through final data collection

Common failure modes

  • Implementation of the group treatment was delayed by more than a year, which may have dampened its measured effect
  • Neither arm produced significant gains in productivity, defect rates or inventory management

Where it fits

Governance type
non-profit productivity centre + international research partnership
Scale
regional (4 Colombian departments)
Income level
upper-middle-income

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 71

Fábricas de Productividad

Colombia

Colombia paired 4,000+ small and mid-size firms across all 32 departments with productivity experts; an independent Fedesarrollo evaluation of 1,035 …