evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Hi-Learning AI Essay Grading — Gyeonggi Province's Contested Pilot in South Korean Schools

South Korea · Suwon · See the South Korea profile

Top 95% 20/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

South Korea's first regional AI essay-grading pilot, run by Gyeonggi Province from July 2025, drew real teacher-trust survey data and documented errors — blank answers scored, essays over-rewarded for length — plus a public backlash after a promotional video mocking teachers forc

Hi-Learning AI Essay Grading — Gyeonggi Province's Contested Pilot in South Korean Schools

Details

Promoter
Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education; Gyeonggi Education Research Institute
Period
July 2025–present
Keywords
education, assessment, academic integrity, AI grading

Description

In July 2025 the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education launched 'Hi-Learning,' reported as South Korea's first regional pilot of AI-based grading for descriptive and short-answer questions, covering Korean language, social studies and science for first-year middle- and high-school students. The system converts scanned handwritten answers to text and scores them against teacher-set rubrics with individualised feedback.

A Gyeonggi Education Research Institute survey at Jeongcheon Middle School found that of 48 teachers, 64.6% (31) had used Hi-Learning; the most-cited reasons for not using it were time constraints and perceived lack of necessity (each 35.5%). Among the 17 teachers who did use it, only 29.4% agreed it reduced their grading workload. Documented error patterns from pilot schools, reported by Kyunghyang Shinmun, included blank answer sheets receiving scores and essays at Cheongbuk High School scored highly for length alone despite missing required source material, alongside under-scoring of concise but correct answers. The research institute found accuracy improved substantially when teachers replaced vague rubric language with quantified criteria.

In November 2025 a promotional video for the system — showing an AI correcting a teacher's encouragement to a student as insincere — triggered public backlash from the Gyeonggi branch of the Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union, which called it an insulting mockery of teachers' professionalism; the video was withdrawn and Superintendent Yim Tae-hee issued a public apology. Despite the unresolved reliability and trust issues, South Korea's Ministry of Education has signalled interest in wider adoption, with several other provincial offices reported to be preparing similar pilots.

Read the full analysis: https://www.khan.co.kr/article/202601090600051

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 33

Turnitin AI writing detection

United States of America

Widely deployed AI-writing detection — but documented false positives, bias against non-native English writers, and wrongful cheating accusations make it …