evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Indawgyi Lake Fish Conservation Zones — Community Co-Managed Fisheries Protection (Myanmar)

Myanmar · Indawgyi · See the Myanmar profile

Top 96% 20/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Nine community co-managed Fish Conservation Zones on Indawgyi Lake, Myanmar's largest lake and a Ramsar site, protect breeding grounds identified with 8 lakeside villages, FFI, FISHBIO and the Fisheries Department, though illegal electrofishing continues.

Indawgyi Lake Fish Conservation Zones — Community Co-Managed Fisheries Protection (Myanmar)

Details

Promoter
Fauna & Flora International Myanmar
Period
2016–ongoing
Keywords
fisheries management, freshwater biodiversity, community conservation

Description

Indawgyi Lake in Kachin State is Myanmar's largest lake and the second largest in Southeast Asia, a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance and the core of the Indawgyi Wildlife Sanctuary, home to nearly 100 bird species and the livelihood base for thousands of lakeside fishing families. The fishery has been declining under pressure from illegal electrofishing, widespread use of small-mesh gillnets, and runoff from nearby gold mining.
Fauna & Flora International (FFI) Myanmar, working with the specialist fisheries organisation FISHBIO, Friends of Wildlife, Myanmar's Fisheries Department and Indawgyi Wildlife Sanctuary staff, facilitated the establishment of nine Fish Conservation Zones (FCZs) around the lake. Zone boundaries combine scientific data on fish breeding habitat with local ecological knowledge, and some build on FCZs the Fisheries Department and Friends of Wildlife had already recognised. FISHBIO ran community meetings across 8 lakeside villages, trained local FFI staff to conduct fisher interviews and collect basic catch data, and helped set up collaborative lake patrols that enforce Myanmar's national fishing-season closures, minimum mesh-size rules and gear restrictions. The zones are co-managed jointly by fishing communities, the Fisheries Department and sanctuary staff.
Published accounts describe how the zones were designed and are patrolled, but do not yet report quantified catch-per-unit-effort or fish-population recovery figures, so the ecological evidence remains descriptive. Illegal electrofishing and mining-related runoff are both reported as continuing pressures, meaning the zones' long-term effectiveness has not been independently verified.

Read the full analysis: https://www.fauna-flora.org/projects/protecting-indawgyi-lake-myanmar/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful