evidoria

What works in Myanmar

All catalogues

7
evaluated practices
41/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Myanmar

Myanmar's development landscape has been marked by significant initiatives across digital literacy, environmental restoration, and entrepreneurship, followed by severe disruption after the February 2021 military coup. Beyond Access reached 63,000+ library visitors across 100+ libraries and the Ayeyarwady Delta mangrove project restored 2,065 hectares while benefiting 11,000 people, while Phandeeyar's accelerator invested US$25,000 per startup across three cohorts through 2019. However, the coup's impact has been severe: Phandeeyar's revenue fell approximately 76% in the coup year, activity was disrupted in the digital literacy programme, and women's representation in governing structures collapsed from 15–17% in the November 2020 elected parliament to 6% in the military's 16-member ruling council.

Drawn from: Beyond Access – Library-Based Digital Literacy Programme (Myanmar) · Myanmar Ayeyarwady Delta Mangrove Blue Carbon Restoration — VCS 1764 · Phandeeyar — Myanmar's First Equity-Taking Startup Accelerator and What the Coup Did to It · Post-Coup Collapse of Women's Political Representation in Myanmar · Myanmar's 'Safe City' AI Surveillance Network — Huawei-Built Facial Recognition Turned Against Pro-Democracy Protesters · Padauk Classroom — AI and Digital Literacy for Displaced Students in Myanmar's Ethnic Areas · Indawgyi Lake Fish Conservation Zones — Community Co-Managed Fisheries Protection (Myanmar)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +23 pts 50 here · 27 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Transferability / replicability -16 pts 44 here · 60 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Scalability & sustainability -29 pts 33 here · 62 average

Governance, certification & transferability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -40 pts 17 here · 57 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -67 pts 11 here · 78 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Achievement / evidence -87 pts 0 here · 87 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
50 · 27
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 48
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Innovation level
63 · 62
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 38
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Transferability / replicability
44 · 60
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Scalability & sustainability
33 · 62
Governance, certification & transferability
33 · 64
Efficiency
0 · 32
Evidence of impact / measured public value
17 · 57
Transparency, fairness & accountability
0 · 54
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Sustainability (ongoing)
11 · 78
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70
Achievement / evidence
0 · 87

Coloured bar: Myanmar. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Beyond Access – Library-Based Digital Literacy Programme (Myanmar) · 72

Myanmar Ayeyarwady Delta Mangrove Blue Carbon Restoration — VCS 1764 · 60

Phandeeyar — Myanmar's First Equity-Taking Startup Accelerator and What the Coup Did to It · 43

Post-Coup Collapse of Women's Political Representation in Myanmar · 37

Myanmar's 'Safe City' AI Surveillance Network — Huawei-Built Facial Recognition Turned Against Pro-Democracy Protesters · 27

Padauk Classroom — AI and Digital Literacy for Displaced Students in Myanmar's Ethnic Areas · 27

Indawgyi Lake Fish Conservation Zones — Community Co-Managed Fisheries Protection (Myanmar) · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Myanmar concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more