Eddleston Water Project — Whole-Catchment Natural Flood Management Trial in the Scottish Borders
United Kingdom
A decade-plus monitored NFM experiment across 24 farms: 300,000+ native trees, ~40 leaky ponds and ~136 flow restrictors; reported ~30% …
Mongolia · Ulaanbaatar · See the Mongolia profile · See the Ulaanbaatar profile
Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 89% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Mongolia's government, with World Bank support, built an Index-Based Livestock Insurance Programme that pays herders once satellite-tracked livestock mortality in their district crosses a 6% threshold after dzud (extreme winter) or drought; by 2009 all 2,117 eligible herders were
Dzud — a compound climate disaster combining summer drought with catastrophic winter cold and snow — periodically kills millions of livestock across Mongolia's rangelands. Starting with a 2005-2006 pilot in three (later four) aimags (provinces), the Government of Mongolia worked with the World Bank to design the Index-Based Livestock Insurance Programme (IBLIP): payouts are triggered automatically once an independently measured district-level livestock mortality rate crosses a 6% threshold, removing the need for costly farm-by-farm loss verification and cutting payout delays.
The programme was institutionalized as a permanent national scheme in 2014. A peer-reviewed hazard-return-interval study (Rao et al., Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2022) has since used the same mortality-index approach to characterize how climate change is altering the frequency of dzud-triggering conditions, reinforcing the index's ecological grounding.
By the 2009-2010 dzud season, all 2,117 herders who held eligible policies received indemnity payments, and policy sales grew year on year in the founding aimags, surpassing 14,000 policies sold as herder confidence in the product grew.
Because payouts arrive before herders are forced into distress destocking or emergency overgrazing of drought-stressed pasture, the scheme is credited by its designers with an indirect rangeland-protection effect, though this pathway has not been directly measured with pasture-condition data specific to Mongolia; the mechanism is a financial-risk instrument rather than a direct ecosystem intervention, so its ecological evidence base remains considerably thinner than its financial-uptake evidence.
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United Kingdom
A decade-plus monitored NFM experiment across 24 farms: 300,000+ native trees, ~40 leaky ponds and ~136 flow restrictors; reported ~30% …
Canada
Since 2019, the Yunesit'in and Xeni Gwet'in First Nations have revived spring and fall cultural burning across Tsilhqot'in Territory, British …
Iceland
Since 2007, Iceland's Hekluskógar project has enlisted 210+ landowners to re-establish native birch woodland around the Hekla volcano, planting 2.3M+ …
United States of America
A 50/50 USACE-SFWMD project backfilled 22 miles of the C-38 flood-control canal and re-carved 44 miles of the Kissimmee River's …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.