evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Index-Based Livestock Insurance Programme (IBLIP) — Dzud & Drought Payouts for Mongolian Herders

Mongolia · Ulaanbaatar · See the Mongolia profile · See the Ulaanbaatar profile

Top 90% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Mongolia's government, with World Bank support, built an Index-Based Livestock Insurance Programme that pays herders once satellite-tracked livestock mortality in their district crosses a 6% threshold after dzud (extreme winter) or drought; by 2009 all 2,117 eligible herders were

Index-Based Livestock Insurance Programme (IBLIP) — Dzud & Drought Payouts for Mongolian Herders

Details

Promoter
Government of Mongolia (Financial Regulatory Commission); World Bank
Period
2006-2014
Keywords
index-based insurance, drought and dzud resilience, pastoral rangeland management, climate risk finance

Description

Dzud -- a compound climate disaster combining summer drought with catastrophic winter cold and snow -- periodically kills millions of livestock across Mongolia's rangelands, devastating the herding households who depend on them. Starting with a 2005-2006 pilot in three (later four) aimags (provinces), the Government of Mongolia worked with the World Bank to design the Index-Based Livestock Insurance Programme (IBLIP): rather than assessing individual animal deaths, payouts are triggered automatically once an independently measured district-level livestock mortality rate crosses a 6% threshold, removing the need for costly farm-by-farm loss verification and cutting payout delays.
By the 2009-2010 dzud season, all 2,117 herders who held eligible policies received indemnity payments, and policy sales grew year on year in the founding aimags, surpassing 14,000 policies sold as herder confidence in the product grew. The programme was institutionalized as a permanent national scheme in 2014. A peer-reviewed hazard-return-interval study (Rao et al., Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2022) has since used the same mortality-index approach to characterize how climate change is altering the frequency of dzud-triggering conditions, reinforcing the index's ecological grounding.
Because payouts arrive before herders are forced into distress destocking or emergency overgrazing of drought-stressed pasture to salvage some income from dying animals, the scheme is credited by its designers with an indirect rangeland-protection effect, though this pathway has not been directly measured with pasture-condition data specific to Mongolia. The mechanism is a financial-risk instrument rather than a direct ecosystem intervention, so its ecological evidence base remains considerably thinner than its financial-uptake evidence.

Read the full analysis: https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/2751/2022/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful