evidoria

What works in Ulaanbaatar

All catalogues · Mongolia profile

31
evaluated practices
54/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 30 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Ulaanbaatar

The evidence mentions Ulaanbaatar only in passing: One Stop Service Centres — Mongolia's Government-Led Network for Domestic Violence Survivors notes that two additional OSSCs were added in Ulaanbaatar during COVID-19, bringing the nationwide total to 17 centres, but provides no separate data on Ulaanbaatar's caseload or service outcomes. DICE — Digital Inclusion through CSO Empowerment (Mongolia) references "peri-urban Ulaanbaatar" as a target population for digital-skills training but does not quantify results specific to the city. The practices do not offer substantive quantified evidence about Ulaanbaatar's broader conditions, services, or outcomes.

Drawn from: e-Mongolia 3.0 — Accessibility Features and 'Khurdan' Kiosks Bringing Digital Government to Herders and Citizens with Disabilities · One Stop Service Centres — Mongolia's Government-Led Network for Domestic Violence Survivors · e-Mongolia — Unified Digital Government Services Platform · DICE — Digital Inclusion through CSO Empowerment (Mongolia) · DEMOSC – Strengthening Digital E-Mongolia Services and Communities · Breathe Mongolia — Citizen-Generated Air-Quality Data and Household Action in Ulaanbaatar · National AI Campaign — Mongolia's Nationwide AI Teacher-Training Drive Across All 21 Provinces · Mongolia's Gender Candidate Quota Reform — 30% Requirement for the State Great Khural (2023)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Effectiveness +32 pts 100 here · 68 average

Evaluation evidence +31 pts 80 here · 49 average

Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +23 pts 60 here · 37 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +10 pts 38 here · 28 average

Governance, certification & transferability +8 pts 72 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -10 pts 52 here · 62 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -11 pts 38 here · 48 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Evaluated outcomes -12 pts 67 here · 79 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -14 pts 40 here · 54 average

Documented learning -14 pts 60 here · 74 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -19 pts 29 here · 48 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -20 pts 27 here · 47 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Curator validation -40 pts 33 here · 73 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -56 pts 33 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Effectiveness
100 · 68
Evaluation evidence
80 · 49
Impact on gender equality
100 · 71
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Teacher capability & pedagogy
60 · 37
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
38 · 28
Governance, certification & transferability
72 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Scalability beyond pilot
69 · 62
Equity & inclusion
53 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured public value
57 · 57
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
4 · 6
Transferability / demonstrated replication
56 · 60
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Innovation level
52 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
38 · 48
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 78
Evaluated outcomes
67 · 79
Transparency, fairness & accountability
40 · 54
Documented learning
60 · 74
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
29 · 48
Transparency, ethics & data protection
27 · 47
Efficiency
0 · 33
Curator validation
33 · 73
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
33 · 89

Coloured bar: Ulaanbaatar. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

e-Mongolia 3.0 — Accessibility Features and 'Khurdan' Kiosks Bringing Digital Government to Herders and Citizens with Disabilities · 92

One Stop Service Centres — Mongolia's Government-Led Network for Domestic Violence Survivors · 85

e-Mongolia — Unified Digital Government Services Platform · 76

DICE — Digital Inclusion through CSO Empowerment (Mongolia) · 72

DEMOSC – Strengthening Digital E-Mongolia Services and Communities · 72

Breathe Mongolia — Citizen-Generated Air-Quality Data and Household Action in Ulaanbaatar · 71

National AI Campaign — Mongolia's Nationwide AI Teacher-Training Drive Across All 21 Provinces · 67

Mongolia's Gender Candidate Quota Reform — 30% Requirement for the State Great Khural (2023) · 63

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more