evidoria

What works in Ulaanbaatar

All catalogues · Mongolia profile

12
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
17%
strong evidence, of 12 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Ulaanbaatar

DEMOSC – Strengthening Digital E-Mongolia Services and Communities deployed digital-literacy training and e-Mongolia service access support to underserved parts of Ulaanbaatar as part of a broader four-province programme, training over 3,200 citizens and civil servants (approximately 60% women) and helping nearly 5,000 residents use e-Mongolia government services. The programme also trained more than 70 teachers as Digital Community Information Workers who ran school-based digital-literacy hubs across the capital and other provinces, with over 10,000 community members reporting improved digital skills. The evidence does not quantify outcomes specific to Ulaanbaatar alone or provide learning-outcome metrics beyond self-reported skill improvements.

Drawn from: e-Mongolia — Unified Digital Government Services Platform · DEMOSC – Strengthening Digital E-Mongolia Services and Communities · National AI Campaign — Mongolia's Nationwide AI Teacher-Training Drive Across All 21 Provinces · Mongolia's Gender Candidate Quota Reform — 30% Requirement for the State Great Khural (2023) · Eduten AI-Adaptive Mathematics — Nationwide Rollout in Mongolia · E-Mongolia 4.0 — Mongolia's AI-Enhanced National Digital Government Platform · Pastoral Nomads take Climate Action — Mongolia Rangeland Plan Vivo Project · Ulaanbaatar's Raw-Coal Ban & Ger-District Heating Transition

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +65 pts 100 here · 35 average

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +25 pts 33 here · 9 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Evidence of learning impact +15 pts 44 here · 30 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Inclusiveness / equity +9 pts 50 here · 41 average

Scalability beyond pilot +9 pts 75 here · 66 average

Weaknesses

Governance, certification & transferability -8 pts 58 here · 66 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -9 pts 44 here · 54 average

Transferability / demonstrated replication -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Innovation level -13 pts 52 here · 64 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -13 pts 67 here · 80 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Documented learning -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Curator validation -75 pts 0 here · 75 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -90 pts 0 here · 90 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
100 · 35
Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
33 · 9
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Evidence of learning impact
44 · 30
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 41
Scalability beyond pilot
75 · 66
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of impact / measured public value
60 · 60
Governance, certification & transferability
58 · 66
Transparency, fairness & accountability
44 · 54
Transferability / demonstrated replication
50 · 59
Innovation level
52 · 64
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 80
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Documented learning
50 · 73
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
50 · 78
Efficiency
0 · 52
Curator validation
0 · 75
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 90

Coloured bar: Ulaanbaatar. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

e-Mongolia — Unified Digital Government Services Platform · 76

DEMOSC – Strengthening Digital E-Mongolia Services and Communities · 72

National AI Campaign — Mongolia's Nationwide AI Teacher-Training Drive Across All 21 Provinces · 67

Mongolia's Gender Candidate Quota Reform — 30% Requirement for the State Great Khural (2023) · 63

Eduten AI-Adaptive Mathematics — Nationwide Rollout in Mongolia · 60

E-Mongolia 4.0 — Mongolia's AI-Enhanced National Digital Government Platform · 60

Pastoral Nomads take Climate Action — Mongolia Rangeland Plan Vivo Project · 60

Ulaanbaatar's Raw-Coal Ban & Ger-District Heating Transition · 57

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more