evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Informe de Impacto de Género — Spain's Annual Gender Impact Report on the National Budget

Spain · Madrid · See the Spain profile · See the Madrid profile

Top 56% 63/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2009 Spain has screened every national budget programme for gender relevance — 372 of 379 rated gender-sensitive in 2023 — though economists call the exercise technically strong but largely 'window dressing', with no proven shift in real allocations.

Details

Promoter
Ministerio de Hacienda / Ministerio de Igualdad
Period
2009–present
Keywords
public finance, budget policy, gender equality, government

Description

Spain has required an annual Gender Impact Report (Informe de Impacto de Género) to accompany its draft national budget since Ley 30/2003, reinforced by the 2007 Gender Equality Organic Law and, since 2020, written directly into the General Budget Law (Article 37.2). Produced jointly by the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Equality, the report screens every spending programme for gender relevance across three fixed sections: current reality, representation, and resources-and-results.
The 2023 edition assessed 379 spending programmes: 372 (98%) were classified as gender-sensitive — 75 of high relevance, 162 of medium relevance and 135 of low relevance — with only 7 programmes rated as having no gender relevance at all. The OECD's 2022 Gender Budgeting Index places Spain among a small group of 'advanced practice' countries, alongside Austria, Iceland, Korea, Mexico and Sweden.
Independent economists are more cautious. María Pazos Morán, former director of Spain's Women's Institute, argues the exercise functions largely as 'window dressing' (vestir el escaparate): technically sophisticated, but its conclusions are almost always 'positive' or 'neutral' and rarely flag a negative gender impact, and the reports have historically lacked figures that tie budget lines to measurable gender objectives. Her assessment is that administrative procedure alone, without sustained political pressure, has not translated the classification exercise into a demonstrated shift in actual resource allocation.

Read the full analysis: https://www.congreso.es/docu/pge2023/Impacto_Genero_2023.pdf

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful