evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

France's Transversal Budget Document on Gender Equality (DPT Égalité Femmes-Hommes)

France · Paris · See the France profile · See the Paris profile

Top 56% 63/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

France attaches an annual gender-equality budget document (DPT) covering about 48 programmes and €5.8bn, but the Cour des comptes calls its funding growth a 'trompe-l'œil' and IGF/IGAS finds ex-ante gender-impact assessments are almost never actually measured.

Details

Promoter
Direction du budget (Ministère chargé des Comptes publics)
Period
2010–present
Keywords
public finance, budget policy, gender equality, government

Description

France attaches a Document de politique transversale (DPT) on gender equality to its annual Budget Bill, listing every ministry's spending judged to contribute to equality between women and men. The statutory basis is Article 128 of Loi n°2005-1720 (30 December 2005), amended repeatedly since; the DPT format in its current shape dates to around 2010 and continues through the PLF2026 budget.
The PLF2025 edition identifies credits across roughly 48 budget programmes totalling €5.8 billion in commitment authority, with 2023 execution reaching €6.5 billion; within that, the dedicated Programme 137 'Égalité entre les femmes et les hommes' itself amounts to €85.1 million in the PLF2025. A joint 2024 inspection by the Inspection générale des finances and Inspection générale des affaires sociales (IGF/IGAS) cites a 23% gender pay gap and 16% wealth gap, and estimates gender discrimination costs France 4-12% of GDP.
Both the Cour des comptes (2023) and IGF/IGAS (2024) are sharply critical of the mechanism itself. The Cour des comptes found the DPT's credit growth from €128 million (2017) to €3.3 billion (2024) reflects reclassification of existing spending into scope rather than new investment — a 'trompe-l'œil' of political commitment. IGF/IGAS found the 2018-19 pilot to integrate gender into budgeting had disappointing results, that the DPT excludes Social Security spending entirely despite it funding major equality levers, and that a legal requirement since 2012 to assess gender impact ex ante is 'almost never' actually carried out.

Read the full analysis: https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/static/17/Annexes-DL/PLF2025-Oranges/09-Orange%20%C3%89galite_femmes_hommes.pdf

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful