evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Karnataka's 'Nirantara' School Facial-Recognition Attendance Plan — Announced, Contested and Shelved

India · Bengaluru · See the India profile · See the Bengaluru profile

Top 100% 7/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Karnataka announced AI facial-recognition attendance for 52,686 schools and ~5.2m students under 'Nirantara' in June 2025. After educators, activists and Privacy International warned of biometric-data risks and child misidentification, the state shelved it within weeks.

Karnataka's 'Nirantara' School Facial-Recognition Attendance Plan — Announced, Contested and Shelved

Details

Promoter
Karnataka Department of School Education and Literacy / Government of Karnataka
Period
June 2025 – August 2025
Keywords
attendance/operations, biometric AI, K-12 public schools, data governance

Description

In June 2025, Karnataka's minister for primary and secondary education, Madhu Bangarappa, told the state legislative assembly that the government planned to deploy AI-based facial-recognition technology to digitise daily attendance across the state's 52,686 government schools and roughly 5.2 million ("52 lakh") students, as part of the wider 'Nirantara' school-digitisation programme championed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah.
The announcement drew rapid opposition from educators, child-rights activists and digital-rights groups. Privacy International and Indian outlets including EducationWorld and Careers360 reported concerns that centralised biometric data on minors could be leaked, sold or misused (including risks of image morphing and sextortion), that facial-recognition accuracy is well documented to be worse for children, women and marginalised groups — raising the risk of wrongly penalising students for absences — and that no clear legal or consent framework existed for collecting children's biometric data at this scale.
Within weeks, the Karnataka government publicly clarified that it would not proceed with facial-recognition attendance, effectively shelving the plan. No pilot deployment, accuracy testing, or learning/administrative-efficiency data was ever published, because the system was cancelled before implementation.
This record documents a cautionary governance case rather than a successful practice: a real, publicly reported instance of a government AI-in-education proposal being contested and reversed on data-protection and child-safety grounds. It is included because it is directly relevant to other education systems considering biometric administrative tools, and because Evidoria records evidence of both successful and unsuccessful AI adoption. All figures (52,686 schools, ~5.2 million students, June–August 2025 timeline) are drawn from contemporaneous Indian news coverage and Privacy International's documentation; no outcome or impact data exists because the programme never launched.

Read the full analysis: https://educationworld.in/educators-and-activists-urge-karnataka-to-drop-facial-recognition-in-schools/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful