Banco ADOPEM and researchers randomly assigned 1,193 Santo Domingo microentrepreneurs to standard accounting training, simplified rule-of-thumb training, or none. The simplified course raised record-keeping 11 points and bad-week sales 18.5%; standard training showed no effect.
Banco ADOPEM, with MIT Sloan & London School of Economics researchers (Drexler, Fischer, Schoar)
Period
2008-2009 intervention; results published 2014
Keywords
microfinance, financial literacy, SME/microenterprise training
Context
Micro-entrepreneurs are frequently offered standard, fundamentals-based accounting courses to improve their business practices, on the theory that better bookkeeping leads to better decisions. Banco ADOPEM, a microfinance institution in Santo Domingo, partnered with researchers from MIT Sloan and the London School of Economics to test that assumption against a radically simplified alternative.
Objectives
1,193 existing ADOPEM clients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a standard accounting-fundamentals course, a simplified course teaching financial rules of thumb (for example, keeping business and personal cash physically separate, or setting aside a fixed share of revenue before spending), or a control group that received neither.
Activities
Both courses were delivered to their respective treatment groups through ADOPEM's existing client base, with outcomes measured roughly one year after training.
Results
The standard accounting course produced almost no significant change in business practices or revenue. The rule-of-thumb course made clients 11 percentage points more likely to report separating business and personal accounts, 11 points more likely to keep any accounting records at all, and 6 points more likely to report calculating revenue — and it raised reported sales in bad weeks by 18.5%. The gains were largest for clients who started out with the weakest financial practices and lowest literacy.
Conclusions
The finding reshaped how development practitioners think about financial-literacy training — simpler, heuristic-based curricula reaching less sophisticated entrepreneurs can outperform technically 'correct' accounting instruction. The main caution is duration: the study measured effects over roughly one year after training, and did not report whether the practices or sales gains persisted over a longer horizon.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Simplified rule-of-thumb course was cheaper to deliver than the standard accounting-fundamentals course, using ADOPEM's existing client base and loan-officer network rather than new infrastructure.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Training intervention was delivered in 2008-2009, with outcomes measured roughly one year later; no longer-run data available.
A 2006–2008 RCT with 1,193 Banco ADOPEM clients in Santo Domingo tested simplified 'rule-of-thumb' financial training against standard accounting courses. …
FINCA Perú added 22 short entrepreneurship-training sessions to routine village-bank meetings for 4,591 mostly female microfinance clients in Ica and …
A Science-published RCT in Lomé assigned 1,500 microfinance clients to psychology-based 'personal initiative' training, traditional business training, or no training; …