evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Teaching Entrepreneurship — FINCA Peru's Village-Bank Business Training Trial

Peru · Lima · See the Peru profile · See the Lima profile

Evidence: Randomised controlled trial Top 72% 62/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A randomised trial added entrepreneurship training to 239 FINCA Peru village banks (4,591 mostly female clients) in Lima and Ayacucho. Short-term sales rose 15%, but the study found little lasting effect on profit; trained clients did repay more reliably.

239
Village banks randomised (2002–2005)
4591
Clients covered
15 %
Short-term sales increase vs comparison group
3 percentage points
Loan-repayment rate improvement

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
FINCA Peru, evaluated with Innovations for Poverty Action and Yale University researchers
Period
2002–2005
Keywords
Microfinance, financial inclusion, business training, women's entrepreneurship

Context

FINCA Peru runs a village-banking microfinance programme for poor, mostly female microentrepreneurs in Lima and the Ayacucho region, built around mandatory weekly credit meetings of pre-existing lending groups.

Objectives

Researchers Dean Karlan and Martín Valdivia added a business-skills curriculum — bookkeeping, cash-flow management, marketing and pricing — to test whether generic business training embedded in microfinance improves outcomes for clients and the lending institution.

Activities

Between 2002 and 2005 the team randomised 239 village banks (4,591 clients) into three arms — 104 banks with mandatory training attendance, 34 with voluntary training, and 101 comparison banks receiving only credit and savings services — publishing the results in the Review of Economics and Statistics (2011).

Results

In the months immediately after training, treated clients reported sales roughly 15% higher than the comparison group and kept better business records, but over the full study period the researchers found little or no lasting change in business revenue, profit or employment. Trained clients did have loan-repayment rates about three percentage points higher and were four percentage points less likely to drop out, a retention effect the researchers calculated was worth more to FINCA than the training's cost.

Conclusions

The authors present this as a rigorous, randomised, peer-reviewed test that did not find the growth effect it was designed to detect on the entrepreneur side, a useful counterweight to assuming that management-upgrading interventions automatically raise SME performance, while showing institutional and client-level benefits can diverge.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
FINCA Peru (village-banking microfinance institution, delivery), Dean Karlan and Martín Valdivia with Innovations for Poverty Action and Yale University (research design and evaluation)

Conditions for success

  • Embedding training into pre-existing mandatory weekly credit-group meetings rather than a stand-alone course
  • Randomised trial design allowing a genuine comparison group
  • Curriculum covering practical skills — bookkeeping, cash-flow, marketing and pricing

Common failure modes

  • No lasting evidence of improved business revenue, profit or employment for entrepreneurs over the full study period, despite the short-term sales bump

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful