evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Kenya's M-Pesa Mobile Money — Gender-Differentiated Poverty and Occupational Impact

Kenya · Nairobi · See the Kenya profile

Kenya's M-Pesa, launched 2007, lifted an est. 194,000 households (2% of Kenyan households) out of poverty by 2014, with female-headed households gaining over double the average effect and ~185,000 women shifting from farming to business (Suri & Jack, Science, 2016).

194,000 households
Households lifted out of poverty (2008-2014)
2 %
Share of all Kenyan households affected (2008-2014)
18.5 %
Extra consumption gain for high- vs low-exposure female-headed households
9.2 percentage points (22% relative to 43.3% baseline)
Extreme-poverty reduction, female-headed households
22.3 %
Increase in financial savings
185,000
Women shifting occupation from farming to business/retail
96 %
Kenyan households with at least one M-Pesa user (mid-2010s)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Safaricom (M-Pesa); evaluated by MIT and Georgetown University researchers
Period
2007–present
Keywords
financial inclusion, mobile money, fintech, poverty reduction, women's economic empowerment

Context

M-Pesa is a mobile-money service launched by Safaricom (Vodafone's Kenyan affiliate) in March 2007, letting users store and transfer money by phone through a nationwide network of cash-in/cash-out agents without needing a bank branch or ATM; by the mid-2010s at least one person in 96% of Kenyan households used it, supported by roughly 110,000 agents versus about 2,700 bank ATMs nationally.

Activities

Users access savings, transfers and payments through the agent network; M-Pesa later added credit products (M-Shwari, Fuliza) built on top of the platform.

Results

A peer-reviewed household panel study (Suri & Jack, Science 2016, following households 2008-2014) estimated that M-Pesa access lifted about 194,000 households (2% of all Kenyan households) out of poverty, with roughly double the effect for female-headed households (18.5% larger consumption gains, a 9.2-percentage-point/22% relative reduction in extreme poverty, and a 22.3% rise in savings), and induced about 185,000 women to shift their main occupation from farming into business or retail.

Conclusions

The gender-differentiated poverty effect is rigorously documented for Kenya specifically; independent commentators have questioned whether the study fully rules out reverse causality (wealthier areas potentially attracting more agents rather than agents causing the wealth gain), and M-Pesa's own credit products have separately drawn criticism for fostering debt dependence.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful