evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Kyoto-iCAP — Kyoto University Innovation Capital

Japan · Kyoto · See the Japan profile

Kyoto University's captive venture-capital arm has raised three funds worth over ¥54 billion since 2016 and built an 86-company deep-tech portfolio — deliberately funding the high-risk research-to-startup gap that Japan's cautious private VC market avoids.

Kyoto-iCAP — Kyoto University Innovation Capital

Details

Promoter
Kyoto University Innovation Capital Co., Ltd.
Period
2014–present
Keywords
technology transfer, university venture capital, deep-tech spin-outs, IP commercialisation

Description

Kyoto University Innovation Capital (Kyoto-iCAP), established in December 2014 as a wholly owned Kyoto University subsidiary certified under Japan's Industrial Competitiveness Enhancement Act, is a university-affiliated venture-capital firm investing in and coaching spin-outs from Kyoto University (and other national-university) research, via entrepreneur-in-residence and executive-coaching programmes designed to de-risk deep-tech companies before private capital steps in.
Official figures (Kyoto-iCAP's own portfolio page and fund announcements) show three sequential funds: "Innovation Kyoto 2016" (¥16.001 billion), "Innovation Kyoto 2021" (¥18.14 billion) and a third fund of roughly ¥20 billion, with institutional limited partners including Bank of Kyoto, Astellas Pharma, Shimadzu and SMBC Trust — cumulative assets under management around ¥54 billion. Independent reporting by Nikkei corroborates the Fund III target and LP roster. The official portfolio page lists 86 current portfolio companies (31 biotech/drug discovery, 25 machinery/materials/energy, 16 healthcare devices, 7 IoT/AI, 7 food/agriculture); portfolio company Chordia Therapeutics listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange in June 2024.
Independent commentary notes Kyoto-iCAP can only invest in startups based on Kyoto University or other national-university research — a structural limit on deal flow — and that it operates specifically because Japan's broader VC culture is risk-averse and slow to fund deep-tech, meaning its existence addresses, rather than closes, that market gap.

Read the full analysis: https://www.kyoto-unicap.co.jp/en/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful