evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Leefstraat (Living Streets) Ghent — A Citizen-Led Public-Space Living Lab

Belgium · Ghent · See the Belgium profile · See the Ghent profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 29% 76/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2012, Ghent has let residents vote each year to temporarily close their street to cars and redesign it together. The format grew from 2 streets to over 25 a year and was later exported via an EU-funded network, though evidence is mostly qualitative.

25+ streets
Residential streets participating in a single year (2021)
56 experiments
Distinct street experiments co-created cumulatively
Leefstraat (Living Streets) Ghent — A Citizen-Led Public-Space Living Lab

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
City of Ghent (Public Transition Lab) / Lab van Troje (Trojan Lab) / Ghent University research partners
Period
2012-present
Region (NUTS)
BE23
Keywords
urban planning, civic participation, mobility, public space

Context

Leefstraat ('living street') is a temporary, citizen-initiated street closure in Ghent: residents of a chosen street vote to remove on-street parking and through-traffic for several months (typically spring to autumn), then redesign the reclaimed space themselves. The City of Ghent's Public Transition Lab and the coordinating NGO Lab van Troje (Trojan Lab) provide logistics, a legal framework and light-touch facilitation.

Activities

The programme began in 2012 with a single pilot street and had grown to more than 25 residential streets participating in a single year by 2021, with 56 distinct street experiments co-created with residents and local businesses over the programme's run.

Results

Evaluation has been mostly qualitative and academic: researchers including Seppe De Blust, Oswald Devisch and Jan Schreurs have published case studies on the governance and participation model, and a 2018 Ghent University-linked research collaboration (favas.net) investigated Ghent's Living Streets alongside its School Streets and Bicycle Streets programmes. Reported effects centre on social cohesion — organisers describe stronger neighbour relationships and collective decision-making over shared space — and the format has been formally exported to other European municipalities through the EU-co-funded EUKI 'Living Streets' project run with Energy Cities.

Conclusions

Because the underlying evidence is largely observational and self-reported by participants and the coordinating NGO, rather than independently measured (no published traffic-count or air-quality dataset was found for Leefstraat specifically, unlike Barcelona's superblocks), the impact case is credible but weaker than for interventions with published quantitative studies. A separate academic critique of Ghent's wider liveable-streets push warns that public-space upgrades of this kind can coincide with rising rents and displacement pressure in surrounding areas, though this has not been specifically quantified for Leefstraat streets.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Light-touch, city-lab/NGO-coordinated logistics per street; no published budget figure in the source material.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Each living street runs one season (spring–autumn); the programme itself has recurred annually since 2012.
Staffing & skills
City of Ghent Public Transition Lab (logistics, legal framework), Lab van Troje / Trojan Lab (coordinating NGO, facilitation), Resident volunteers / street committees, Ghent University research partners (evaluation)

Conditions for success

  • Resident vote/buy-in to close a street to parking and through-traffic
  • Light-touch legal and logistical support from a city transition lab
  • A coordinating NGO to facilitate design and mediate between residents and city

Common failure modes

  • No independently measured traffic-count or air-quality data specific to Leefstraat streets
  • Academic critique flags a risk that liveable-street upgrades coincide with rising rents/displacement in surrounding areas

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 95

Smart Open Lisboa

Portugal

Smart Open Lisboa (SOL) is a startup program focused on the validation and integration of innovative solutions meant to upgrade …