evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Maisha Namba — Kenya's Biometric National ID Clears a 600,000-Card Backlog While Fighting Data-Protection Lawsuits

Kenya · Nairobi · See the Kenya profile · See the Nairobi profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 83% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Kenya's National Registration Bureau printed 1.7 million Maisha Namba ID cards in 2024 and cleared a 600,000-card backlog using biometric enrolment, even as the High Court twice halted rollout over missing data-protection impact assessments.

1.7 million
ID cards printed (2024) (2024)
600,000+ applications
Backlog cleared (2024)
8,000 → 25,000–30,000 cards/day
Daily card production capacity
32 million cards
Card issuance target (by end-2026)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
State Department for Immigration and Citizen Services (National Registration Bureau), Kenya
Period
2023–2026
Keywords
digital identity, biometrics, civil registration, data protection

Context

Maisha Namba is Kenya's rebuilt national digital identity system, replacing the abandoned Huduma Namba/NIIMS programme, run by the State Department for Immigration and Citizen Services. It links birth records and biometric data (fingerprints, photograph) to a single Maisha Card consolidating national ID, passport and other credentials.

Objectives

Issue a lifelong unique identity number to every citizen and consolidate multiple credentials into one biometric card and register.

Activities

The National Registration Bureau enrols citizens biometrically and prints Maisha Cards, working to raise daily production capacity toward a 32-million-card target by end-2026.

Results

In 2024 the Bureau printed 1.7 million ID cards and cleared more than 600,000 backlogged applications, raising daily production capacity from around 8,000 to a planned 25,000–30,000 cards a day.

Conclusions

Rollout has proceeded under sustained legal challenge: courts twice halted issuance over a missing Data Protection Impact Assessment, and petitioners say data-sharing arrangements covering some 450 entities remain undisclosed, leaving Maisha Namba a contested case of real operational scale alongside unresolved data-governance questions.

Implementation
Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
National Registration Bureau enrolment and card-printing operations, State Department for Immigration and Citizen Services

Conditions for success

  • Completing the legally required Data Protection Impact Assessment
  • Disclosing data-sharing arrangements with the roughly 450 entities named in litigation
  • Sustained court compliance to avoid further injunctions

Common failure modes

  • Court injunctions have twice halted card issuance over missing DPIA compliance
  • Undisclosed data-sharing arrangements have drawn ongoing litigation and public distrust

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful