evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

NIRA's Tech5 ABIS — Uganda's Biometric De-Duplication Powering a Single National Digital ID

Uganda · Kampala · See the Uganda profile · See the Kampala profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 51% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Uganda's NIRA migrated over 28 million identity records onto a MOSIP-based platform using Tech5's ABIS to cross-match fingerprints, iris and face, so citizens enrol once and the same biometric record underpins renewals, new IDs and future service integrations.

28+ million records
Identity records migrated from the legacy database (by Feb 2026)
14.3 million (90.5% of target)
Renewals completed against target (by Feb 2026)
6.4 million (37.3% of target)
First-time enrolments completed against target (by Feb 2026)
10,000+ records
National ID records flagged for inconsistencies
NIRA's Tech5 ABIS — Uganda's Biometric De-Duplication Powering a Single National Digital ID

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
National Identification and Registration Authority (NIRA)
Period
2024–present
Keywords
digital identity, biometrics, civil registration

Context

Uganda's National Identification and Registration Authority (NIRA) is replacing its legacy national ID system with a MOSIP-based platform built by Tahaluf as prime contractor, with Technoforte as system integrator and Tech5 supplying the Automated Biometric Identification System (ABIS) used for de-duplication. ABIS cross-references fingerprints, iris scans and facial images so each citizen receives one unique identifier before a card is issued.

Objectives

The project's stated ambition is to bring 50 million people into a single digital identity ecosystem and migrate 30 million legacy records, laying the technical foundation for a once-only registry that other agencies can eventually query instead of re-collecting citizen data, with civil registry modules for births and deaths intended for later integration.

Activities

A mass campaign launched in May 2025 targeted 15.8 million renewals and 17.2 million first-time registrations. By February 2026, NIRA reported more than 28 million identity records migrated from the legacy database and over 35 million total enrolments captured in the new population register.

Results

As of the February 2026 update, 14.3 million renewals (90.5% of target) and 6.4 million first-time enrolments (37.3% of target) had been completed, with 10.1 million cards printed and 2.5 million collected. During the drive, NIRA also flagged more than 10,000 national ID records for inconsistencies such as falsified details or unauthorised changes, a by-product of automated biometric and data cross-matching rather than a designed impact metric.

Conclusions

The figures show the rollout is real but still well short of universal coverage, and no independently audited false-match/non-match rates, cost data or outcome evaluation, such as a measured reduction in duplicate benefit claims, have been published; the evidence base so far is operational and vendor/agency-reported rather than independently verified.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Mass campaign launched May 2025; targets partially met by the February 2026 update; civil registry (births/deaths) modules planned for later integration.
Staffing & skills
National Identification and Registration Authority (NIRA), implementing agency, Tahaluf, prime contractor, Technoforte, system integrator, Tech5, ABIS vendor

Conditions for success

  • MOSIP open-source platform as the technical foundation
  • Multi-modal biometric cross-matching (fingerprint, iris, face) for de-duplication
  • Mass renewal/registration campaign infrastructure and targets

Common failure modes

  • No independently audited false-match/non-match rates or cost data published
  • First-time enrolment target only 37.3% complete as of the latest update, well short of universal coverage

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful